416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29033154)
41. [Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects].
Chen L; Hong G; Lin T; Huang L; Zhang Q; He W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 34(3):341-346. PubMed ID: 32174080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Can porous tantalum acetabular cups and augments restore the hip centre of rotation in revision hip arthroplasty? Long-term results.
Concina C; Crucil M; Gherlinzoni F
Acta Biomed; 2022 Mar; 92(S3):e2021549. PubMed ID: 35604256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Outcomes of Revisions of the Acetabular Component of THA with Paprosky Type 3a and 3b Defects Using Tantalum Trabecular Metal Implants 2-10 Years Postoperatively].
Musil D; Trnka T; Klouda J; PertlÍČek J; Held M; StehlÍk J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(6):387-395. PubMed ID: 33408003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Medial wall reconstruction using metal disc augments in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Deng W; Wu T; Wang Z; Shao H; Yang D; Zhou Y
Int Orthop; 2023 May; 47(5):1203-1212. PubMed ID: 36810967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Favorable Results of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Acetabular Impaction Bone Grafting for Large Segmental Bone Defects in Dysplastic Hips.
Iwase T; Morita D; Ito T; Takemoto G; Makida K
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2221-6. PubMed ID: 27133930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Uncemented porous tantalum acetabular components: early follow-up and failures in 613 primary total hip arthroplasties.
Noiseux NO; Long WJ; Mabry TM; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):617-20. PubMed ID: 23993435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Porous-ingrowth revision acetabular implants secured with peripheral screws. A minimum twelve-year follow-up.
Weeden SH; Paprosky WG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jun; 88(6):1266-71. PubMed ID: 16757760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular shells in revision total hip replacement: two to four year clinical and radiographic results.
Kim WY; Greidanus NV; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
Hip Int; 2008; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18645969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Outcome of Patients Treated With Porous Tantalum Acetabular Implants for Neoplastic Periacetabular Lesions.
Houdek MT; Abdel MP; Perry KI; Salduz A; Rose PS; Sim FH; Lewallen DG
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Mar; 28(6):256-262. PubMed ID: 31305354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of Porous Tantalum Acetabular Implants and Harrington Reconstruction for Metastatic Disease of the Acetabulum.
Houdek MT; Ferguson PC; Abdel MP; Griffin AM; Hevesi M; Perry KI; Rose PS; Wunder JS; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Jul; 102(14):1239-1247. PubMed ID: 32675673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Three-dimensional technology assisted trabecular metal cup and augments positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with complex acetabular defects.
Li Q; Chen X; Lin B; Ma Y; Liao JX; Zheng Q
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Dec; 14(1):431. PubMed ID: 31829273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparable Results With Porous Metal Augments in Combination With Either Cemented or Uncemented Cups in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of One Hundred Forty-Seven Revisions at a Mean of Five Years.
Mahmoud AN; Sundberg M; Flivik G
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1612-1617. PubMed ID: 28062151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 19582528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Double-Cup Construct: A Novel Treatment Strategy for the Management of Paprosky IIIA and IIIB Acetabular Defects.
Webb JE; McGill RJ; Palumbo BT; Moschetti WE; Estok DM
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9S):S225-S231. PubMed ID: 28529110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Tantalum acetabular augments in one-stage exchange of infected total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study.
Klatte TO; Kendoff D; Sabihi R; Kamath AF; Rueger JM; Gehrke T
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1443-8. PubMed ID: 24559522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A new 3D printing porous trabecular titanium metal acetabular cup for primary total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up of 92 consecutive patients.
Geng X; Li Y; Li F; Wang X; Zhang K; Liu Z; Tian H
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Sep; 15(1):383. PubMed ID: 32887636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip arthroplasties using porous tantalum modular acetabular components: 5-year follow-up of clinical trial.
Nakashima Y; Mashima N; Imai H; Mitsugi N; Taki N; Mochida Y; Owan I; Arakaki K; Yamamoto T; Mawatari T; Motomura G; Ohishi M; Doi T; Kanazawa M; Iwamoto Y
Mod Rheumatol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 22395477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects.
Weeden SH; Schmidt RH
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):151-5. PubMed ID: 17823035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A single centre study of 41 cases on the use of porous tantalum metal implants in acetabular revision surgery.
Theil C; Schmidt-Braekling T; Gosheger G; Moellenbeck B; Schwarze J; Dieckmann R
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):238. PubMed ID: 31113411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Treatment of Acetabular Defects with Porous Metal Augments in Revision Hip Surgery.
Ciriviri J; Nestorovski Z; Talevski D; Vranishkovski T; Kostov H
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2019 Oct; 40(2):33-39. PubMed ID: 31605583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
