113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29033675)
1. Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value?
Köroğlu R; Köksal İ; Şimşek FS; Gezer F; Kekilli E; Ünal B
World J Nucl Med; 2017; 16(4):275-280. PubMed ID: 29033675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of Clinical Molecular Typing of Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Using
Zhang J; Liu Y; Fan H; Wang W; Shao W; Cao G; Shi X
Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2():S82-S92. PubMed ID: 36624021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of FDG PET/CT in the Characterization of Sinonasal Neoplasms: Analysis of Standardized Uptake Value Parameters.
Ozturk K; Gencturk M; Caicedo-Granados E; Li F; Cayci Z
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1354-1360. PubMed ID: 30300005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamics of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the liver and its correlation with hepatic fat content and BMI.
Seraj SM; Al-Zaghal A; Zadeh MZ; Jahangiri P; Pournazari K; Raynor WY; Werner TJ; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Alavi A; Hunt SJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 May; 40(5):545-551. PubMed ID: 30807535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT methods of analysis for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer.
Altini C; Niccoli Asabella A; De Luca R; Fanelli M; Caliandro C; Quartuccio N; Rubini D; Cistaro A; Montemurro S; Rubini G
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jun; 40(5):1190-202. PubMed ID: 25348731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of
Jena A; Taneja S; Singh A; Negi P; Sarin R; Das PK; Singhal M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 28678576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the Detection of Ovarian Malignancy.
Park T; Lee S; Park S; Lee E; Pahk K; Rhee S; Cho J; Kim C; Eo JS; Choe JG; Kim S
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Mar; 49(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 25774237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of breast cancer recurrence using lymph node metabolic and volumetric parameters from
Kim YI; Kim YJ; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Lee DS; Chung JK; Kang KW
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Oct; 44(11):1787-1795. PubMed ID: 28616695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Relationship Between Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression of Breast Cancer and the Retention Index in Dual Phase (18)F-FDG PET/CT.
Moon H; Noh WC; Kim HA; Kim EK; Park KW; Lee SS; Choi JH; Han KW; Byun BH; Lim I; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Sep; 50(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 27540429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Beiderwellen K; Nensa F; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):870-6. PubMed ID: 23394765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using (18)fluorine-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography and serum carcinoembryonic antigen: a prospective study.
Li QW; Zheng RL; Ling YH; Wang QX; Xiao WW; Zeng ZF; Fan W; Li LR; Gao YH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Aug; 41(8):1448-55. PubMed ID: 27116012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metabolic Tumor Burden Assessed by Dual Time Point [
Garcia-Vicente AM; Pérez-Beteta J; Pérez-García VM; Molina D; Jiménez-Londoño GA; Soriano-Castrejón A; Martínez-González A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Aug; 19(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 27981471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
Groheux D; Martineau A; Teixeira L; Espié M; de Cremoux P; Bertheau P; Merlet P; Lemarignier C
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 28057031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 18F-FDG retention index and biologic prognostic parameters in breast cancer.
García Vicente AM; Castrejón ÁS; Relea Calatayud F; Muñoz AP; León Martín AA; López-Muñiz IC; Del Mar Muñoz Sánchez M; Cordero García JM; Becerra Nakayo EM
Clin Nucl Med; 2012 May; 37(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 22475895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship Between Dual Time Point FDG PET/CT and Clinical Prognostic Indexes in Patients with High Grade Lymphoma: a Pilot Study.
Lim DH; Lee JH
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Dec; 51(4):323-330. PubMed ID: 29242726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
