316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29034236)
1. Prognostic Value of the New Prostate Cancer International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups.
Offermann A; Hohensteiner S; Kuempers C; Ribbat-Idel J; Schneider F; Becker F; Hupe MC; Duensing S; Merseburger AS; Kirfel J; Reischl M; Lubczyk V; Kuefer R; Perner S
Front Med (Lausanne); 2017; 4():157. PubMed ID: 29034236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.
Pierorazio PM; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 23464824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Gianduzzo T; Coughlin G; Duffy D; LeFevre I; Johannsen S; Egevad L; Yaxley J
Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 26325670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Correlation analysis between prostate imaging report and data system score and pathological results of prostate cancer].
Zhu LY; Ding XF; Huang TB; Luan Y; Guo CH; Xu YZ; Wang F
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 100(34):2663-2668. PubMed ID: 32921014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.
Helpap B; Ringli D; Tonhauser J; Poser I; Breul J; Gevensleben H; Seifert HH
Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Apr; 22(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 26563277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
Takeuchi N; Sakamoto S; Nishiyama A; Horikoshi T; Yamada Y; Iizuka J; Maimaiti M; Imamura Y; Kawamura K; Imamoto T; Komiya A; Ikehara Y; Akakura K; Ichikawa T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Validation of the 2005 ISUP Gleason Grading System in a Cohort of Intermediate and High Risk Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Faraj SF; Bezerra SM; Yousefi K; Fedor H; Glavaris S; Han M; Partin AW; Humphreys E; Tosoian J; Johnson MH; Davicioni E; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE; Netto GJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146189. PubMed ID: 26731672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kim H; Jung G; Kim JH; Byun SS; Hong SK
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17447. PubMed ID: 34465825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Takeshima Y; Yamada Y; Teshima T; Fujimura T; Kakutani S; Hakozaki Y; Kimura N; Akiyama Y; Sato Y; Kawai T; Yamada D; Kume H
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):501. PubMed ID: 33947348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Grading System on Concept of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Milonas D; Venclovas Ž; Gudinaviciene I; Auskalnis S; Zviniene K; Jurkiene N; Basevicius A; Patasius A; Jievaltas M; Joniau S
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1272. PubMed ID: 31824852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
