These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29035046)

  • 1. Viscosity of Water Interfaces with Hydrophobic Nanopores: Application to Water Flow in Carbon Nanotubes.
    Shaat M
    Langmuir; 2017 Nov; 33(44):12814-12819. PubMed ID: 29035046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wettability effect on nanoconfined water flow.
    Wu K; Chen Z; Li J; Li X; Xu J; Dong X
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Mar; 114(13):3358-3363. PubMed ID: 28289228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rectified and Salt Concentration Dependent Wetting of Hydrophobic Nanopores.
    Polster JW; Aydin F; de Souza JP; Bazant MZ; Pham TA; Siwy ZS
    J Am Chem Soc; 2022 Jul; 144(26):11693-11705. PubMed ID: 35729706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Water in Nanopores and Biological Channels: A Molecular Simulation Perspective.
    Lynch CI; Rao S; Sansom MSP
    Chem Rev; 2020 Sep; 120(18):10298-10335. PubMed ID: 32841020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancement of oil flow in shale nanopores by manipulating friction and viscosity.
    Ho TA; Wang Y
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 Jun; 21(24):12777-12786. PubMed ID: 31120076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydraulic transport across hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanopores: Flow experiments with water and n-hexane.
    Gruener S; Wallacher D; Greulich S; Busch M; Huber P
    Phys Rev E; 2016 Jan; 93(1):013102. PubMed ID: 26871150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voltage Gating of a Biomimetic Nanopore: Electrowetting of a Hydrophobic Barrier.
    Trick JL; Song C; Wallace EJ; Sansom MS
    ACS Nano; 2017 Feb; 11(2):1840-1847. PubMed ID: 28141923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative effect of nanoconfinement on water transport across nanotube membranes.
    Zhao K; Wu H; Han B
    J Chem Phys; 2017 Oct; 147(16):164705. PubMed ID: 29096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of fluid slip in cylindrical nanopores using equilibrium molecular simulations.
    Sam A; Hartkamp R; Kannam SK; Sathian SP
    Nanotechnology; 2018 Nov; 29(48):485404. PubMed ID: 30207542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hydrophilicity and the viscosity of interfacial water.
    Goertz MP; Houston JE; Zhu XY
    Langmuir; 2007 May; 23(10):5491-7. PubMed ID: 17408290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancing water permeation through alumina membranes by changing from cylindrical to conical nanopores.
    Nalaparaju A; Wang J; Jiang J
    Nanoscale; 2019 May; 11(20):9869-9878. PubMed ID: 30994645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of effective polarization on ion and water interactions within a biomimetic nanopore.
    Phan LX; Lynch CI; Crain J; Sansom MSP; Tucker SJ
    Biophys J; 2022 Jun; 121(11):2014-2026. PubMed ID: 35527400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Water Nanoconfined in a Hydrophobic Pore: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Transmembrane Protein 175 and the Influence of Water Models.
    Lynch CI; Klesse G; Rao S; Tucker SJ; Sansom MSP
    ACS Nano; 2021 Dec; 15(12):19098-19108. PubMed ID: 34784172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomimetic solution against dewetting in a highly hydrophobic nanopore.
    Picaud F; Paris G; Gharbi T; Balme S; Lepoitevin M; Tangaraj V; Bechelany M; Janot JM; Balanzat E; Henn F
    Soft Matter; 2016 Jun; 12(22):4903-11. PubMed ID: 27157717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thermal transpiration through single walled carbon nanotubes and graphene channels.
    Thekkethala JF; Sathian SP
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Nov; 139(17):174712. PubMed ID: 24206327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High Interfacial Barriers at Narrow Carbon Nanotube-Water Interfaces.
    Varanasi SR; Subramanian Y; Bhatia SK
    Langmuir; 2018 Jul; 34(27):8099-8111. PubMed ID: 29905485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reassessing fast water transport through carbon nanotubes.
    Thomas JA; McGaughey AJ
    Nano Lett; 2008 Sep; 8(9):2788-93. PubMed ID: 18665654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interfacial water at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces: slip, viscosity, and diffusion.
    Sendner C; Horinek D; Bocquet L; Netz RR
    Langmuir; 2009 Sep; 25(18):10768-81. PubMed ID: 19591481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond the continuum: how molecular solvent structure affects electrostatics and hydrodynamics at solid-electrolyte interfaces.
    Bonthuis DJ; Netz RR
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Oct; 117(39):11397-413. PubMed ID: 24063251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluid structure and transport properties of water inside carbon nanotubes.
    Liu Y; Wang Q; Wu T; Zhang L
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Dec; 123(23):234701. PubMed ID: 16392938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.