These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29035072)

  • 1. Distinguishing among potential mechanisms of singleton suppression.
    Gaspelin N; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Apr; 44(4):626-644. PubMed ID: 29035072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.
    Won BY; Kosoyan M; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 30596437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failed Suppression of Salient Stimuli Precedes Behavioral Errors.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Busch NA; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 32(2):367-377. PubMed ID: 31702429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. P
    Drisdelle BL; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Sep; 58(9):e13878. PubMed ID: 34110022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention.
    Chang S; Egeth HE
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1724-1732. PubMed ID: 31693453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons.
    Gaspelin N; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 27804032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distractor's salience does not determine feature suppression: A commentary on Wang and Theeuwes (2020).
    Ramgir A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jun; 49(6):852-861. PubMed ID: 37276124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.
    Kerzel D; Barras C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An electrophysiological assessment of distractor suppression in visual search tasks.
    Mazza V; Turatto M; Caramazza A
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Jul; 46(4):771-5. PubMed ID: 19490518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ignoring the unknown: Attentional suppression of unpredictable visual distraction.
    Ma X; Abrams RA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 36227324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suppression of salient objects prevents distraction in visual search.
    Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 34(16):5658-66. PubMed ID: 24741056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of color and face singleton distractors: evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Zhang Y; Zhang H; Fu S
    Cereb Cortex; 2024 Apr; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 38679483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
    J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(9):3390-401. PubMed ID: 24573295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.