These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29036070)
1. Improvement of contrast sensitivity with practice is not compatible with a sensory threshold account. Solomon JA; Tyler CW J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Jun; 34(6):870-880. PubMed ID: 29036070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The slope of the psychometric function and non-stationarity of thresholds in spatiotemporal contrast vision. Wallis SA; Baker DH; Meese TS; Georgeson MA Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 76():1-10. PubMed ID: 23041562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: the quick TvC method. Lesmes LA; Jeon ST; Lu ZL; Dosher BA Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3160-76. PubMed ID: 16782167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What limits performance in the amblyopic visual system: seeing signals in noise with an amblyopic brain. Levi DM; Klein SA; Chen I J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):1.1-23. PubMed ID: 18484840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of Gabor patterns of different sizes, shapes, phases and eccentricities. Foley JM; Varadharajan S; Koh CC; Farias MC Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):85-107. PubMed ID: 17078992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of a dynamic termination criterion in the ZEST adaptive threshold method. Anderson AJ Vision Res; 2003 Jan; 43(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 12536138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In search of an elusive hard threshold: a test of observer's ability to order sub-threshold stimuli. Logvinenko AD; Byth W; Vityaev EE Vision Res; 2004 Feb; 44(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 14642900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers. Jäkel F; Wichmann FA J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(11):1307-22. PubMed ID: 17209737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual learning of motion direction discrimination in fovea: separable mechanisms. Lu ZL; Chu W; Dosher BA Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(15):2315-27. PubMed ID: 16524611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast discrimination and choice reaction times at near-threshold pedestals. Tiippana K; Paramei GV; Alshuth E Spat Vis; 2001; 15(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 11893123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of noise on the contrast detection threshold in visual perception. Sasaki H; Todorokihara M; Ishida T; Miyachi J; Kitamura T; Aoki R Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 16996210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Theory and data for area summation of contrast with and without uncertainty: evidence for a noisy energy model. Meese TS; Summers RJ J Vis; 2012 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 23077206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors limiting suprathreshold vision measured by a flash-sound simultaneity paradigm. Manahilov V; Findlay K; Simpson WA Vision Res; 2004; 44(22):2577-85. PubMed ID: 15358073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Zero-dimensional noise: the best mask you never saw. Baker DH; Meese TS J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]