123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29036395)
1. MICRODOSIMETRIC MODELING OF THE RELATIVE LUMINESCENCE EFFICIENCY OF LiF:Mg,Ti (MTS) DETECTORS EXPOSED TO CHARGED PARTICLES.
Parisi A; Van Hoey O; Vanhavere F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Aug; 180(1-4):192-195. PubMed ID: 29036395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MICRODOSIMETRIC MODELING OF THE RELATIVE LUMINESCENCE EFFICIENCY OF LiF:Mg,Cu,P (MCP) DETECTORS EXPOSED TO CHARGED PARTICLES.
Parisi A; Van Hoey O; Mégret P; Vanhavere F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 May; 183(1-2):172-176. PubMed ID: 30561684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LiF:Mg,Ti (MTT) TL detectors optimised for high-LET radiation dosimetry.
Bilski P; Budzanowski M; Olko P; Mandowska E
Radiat Meas; 2004; 38(4-6):427-30. PubMed ID: 15856580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetry of heavy charged particles with thermoluminescence detectors--models and applications.
Olko P; Bilski P; Budzanowski M; Molokanov A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):315-8. PubMed ID: 15353666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the relationship between dose-, energy- and LET-response of thermoluminescent detectors.
Olko P; Bilski P; El-Faramawy NA; Göksu HY; Kim JL; Kopec R; Waligórski MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):15-22. PubMed ID: 16644968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling the response of thermoluminescence detectors exposed to low- and high-LET radiation fields.
Olko P; Bilski P; Budzanowski M; Waligórski MP; Reitz G
J Radiat Res; 2002 Dec; 43 Suppl():S59-62. PubMed ID: 12793731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Energy response of different types of RADOS personal dosemeters with MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) and MCP-N (LiF:Mg,Cu,P) TL detectors.
Obryk B; Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Budzanowski M; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):211-4. PubMed ID: 21227957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the relative TL efficiency of the thermoluminescent detectors to heavy charged particles.
Sądel M; Bilski P; Swakoń J; Weber A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jan; 168(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25656042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microdosimetric modelling of the response of thermoluminescence detectors to low- and high-LET ionising radiation.
Olko P; Bilski P; Budzanowski M; Czopyk L; Swakon J; Waligorski MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):378-81. PubMed ID: 17261540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING WITH PASSIVE DETECTORS AT CTN IN PORTUGAL.
Pereira MF; Pereira J; Rangel S; Saraiva M; Santos LM; Cardoso JV; Alves JG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):342-5. PubMed ID: 26598737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microdosimetric interpretation of the photon energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti detectors.
Olko P; Bilski P; Kim JL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):119-22. PubMed ID: 12382842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A THIN-LAYER LIF THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSEMETER SYSTEM WITH FAST READOUT FOR THE USE IN PERSONAL DOSIMETRY SERVICES.
Walbersloh J; Busch F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):191-4. PubMed ID: 26622040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti to low energy carbon and oxygen ions.
Rodríguez-Villafuerte M; Avila O; Buenfil AE; Gamboa-deBuen I; Ruiz CG; Brandan ME
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):106-10. PubMed ID: 16698969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comments on 'Observation of enhanced efficiency in the excitation of ion-induced LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent peaks' G. Massillon., I. Gamboa-deBuen and M.E. Brandan, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 103521-1 (2006).
Horowitz YS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(4):411-6; author reply 417-9. PubMed ID: 17686963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Response of thermoluminescent detectors to charged particles and to neutrons.
Spurný F
Radiat Meas; 2004; 38(4-6):407-12. PubMed ID: 15856571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre- and post-irradiation fading effect for LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P materials used in routine monitoring.
Carinou E; Askounis P; Dimitropoulou F; Kiranos G; Kyrgiakou H; Nirgianaki E; Papadomarkaki E; Kamenopoulou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):207-10. PubMed ID: 21199822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FADING EFFECT OF LiF:Mg,Ti AND LiF:Mg,Cu,P Ext-Rad AND WHOLE-BODY DETECTORS.
Pereira J; Pereira MF; Rangel S; Saraiva M; Santos LM; Cardoso JV; Alves JG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):177-80. PubMed ID: 26503857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL efficiency for X-rays and their application to Monte Carlo simulations of dosemeter response.
Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):483-6. PubMed ID: 16822775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
