These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

750 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29036407)

  • 1. Prognostic value of the circumferential resection margin and its definitions in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
    Depypere L; Moons J; Lerut T; De Hertogh G; Peters C; Sagaert X; Coosemans W; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Feb; 31(2):. PubMed ID: 29036407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic Value of the Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.
    Hulshoff JB; Faiz Z; Karrenbeld A; Kats-Ugurlu G; Burgerhof JG; Smit JK; Plukker JT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S1301-9. PubMed ID: 26314875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic Significant or Not? The Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer: Impact on Local Recurrence and Overall Survival in Patients Without Neoadjuvant Treatment.
    Ghadban T; Reeh M; Koenig AM; Nentwich MF; Bellon E; Izbicki JR; Vashist YK; Kutup A
    Ann Surg; 2017 Dec; 266(6):988-994. PubMed ID: 27617855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lack of independent significance of a close (<1 mm) circumferential resection margin involvement in esophageal and junctional cancer.
    O'Farrell NJ; Donohoe CL; Muldoon C; Costelloe JM; King S; Ravi N; Reynolds JV
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2727-33. PubMed ID: 23463085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: significance of microscopically positive circumferential radial margins.
    Harvin JA; Lahat G; Correa AM; Lee J; Maru D; Ajani J; Marom EM; Welsh J; Bhutani MS; Walsh G; Roth J; Mehran R; Vaporciyan A; Rice D; Swisher S; Hofstetter W
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 143(2):412-20. PubMed ID: 22172216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement in patients receiving potentially curative treatment for oesophageal cancer.
    Quinn LM; Hollis AC; Hodson J; Elshafie MA; Hallissey MT; Whiting JL; Griffiths EA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1268-1277. PubMed ID: 29843937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to define a positive circumferential resection margin in T3 adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
    Verhage RJ; Zandvoort HJ; ten Kate FJ; van Hillegersberg R
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jun; 35(6):919-26. PubMed ID: 21566512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography.
    Reid TD; Chan DS; Roberts SA; Crosby TD; Williams GT; Lewis WG
    Br J Cancer; 2012 Dec; 107(12):1925-31. PubMed ID: 23169281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. R1 rectal resection: look up and don't look down.
    Tilly C; Lefèvre JH; Svrcek M; Shields C; Fléjou JF; Tiret E; Parc Y
    Ann Surg; 2014 Nov; 260(5):794-9; discussion 799-800. PubMed ID: 25379851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: prognostic value of circumferential resection margin and stratification of N1 category.
    Saha AK; Sutton C; Rotimi O; Dexter S; Sue-Ling H; Sarela AI
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1364-70. PubMed ID: 19252949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of a positive circumferential resection margin at surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.
    Knight WRC; Yip C; Wulaningsih W; Jacques A; Griffin N; Zylstra J; Van Hemelrijck M; Maisey N; Gaya A; Baker CR; Kelly M; Gossage JA; Lagergren J; Landau D; Goh V; Davies AR; ; Ngan S; Qureshi A; Deere H; Green M; Chang F; Mahadeva U; Gill-Barman B; George S; Dunn J; Zeki S; Meenan J; Hynes O; Tham G; Iezzi C
    BJS Open; 2019 Dec; 3(6):767-776. PubMed ID: 31832583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rectal cancers with microscopic circumferential resection margin involvement (R1 resections): Survivals, patterns of recurrence, and prognostic factors.
    Gravante G; Hemingway D; Stephenson JA; Sharpe D; Osman A; Haines M; Pirjamali V; Sorge R; Yeung JM; Norwood M; Miller A; Boyle K
    J Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 114(5):642-648. PubMed ID: 27383398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is There an Optimal Definition for a Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer?
    Brac B; Dufour C; Behal H; Vanderbeken M; Labreuche J; Leteurtre E; Mariette C; Eveno C; Piessen G; Renaud F;
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):8337-8346. PubMed ID: 34514523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Significance of Microscopically Incomplete Resection Margin After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Markar SR; Gronnier C; Duhamel A; Pasquer A; Théreaux J; Chalret du Rieu M; Lefevre JH; Turner K; Luc G; Mariette C;
    Ann Surg; 2016 Apr; 263(4):712-8. PubMed ID: 26135681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after concurrent chemoradiation therapy and surgery.
    Liu CY; Wang BY; Lee MY; Tsai YC; Liu CC; Shih CH
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2013 Oct; 76(10):570-5. PubMed ID: 23938149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lymph node harvest in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
    Shridhar R; Hoffe SE; Almhanna K; Weber JM; Chuong MD; Karl RC; Meredith K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):3038-43. PubMed ID: 23625142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The prognostic significance of the positive circumferential resection margin in pathologic T3 squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Okada N; Fujii S; Fujita T; Kanamori J; Kojima T; Hayashi R; Daiko H
    Surgery; 2016 Feb; 159(2):441-50. PubMed ID: 26391150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic value of added stratification of circumferential resection margin status in oesophageal carcinoma.
    Ahmad J; Loughrey MB; Donnelly D; Ranaghan L; Shah R; Napolitano G; Kennedy AJ
    Histopathology; 2013 Apr; 62(5):752-63. PubMed ID: 23530586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A critical appraisal of circumferential resection margins in esophageal carcinoma.
    Pultrum BB; Honing J; Smit JK; van Dullemen HM; van Dam GM; Groen H; Hollema H; Plukker JT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):812-20. PubMed ID: 19924487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of circumferential resection margin clearance criteria with survival after surgery for cancer of esophagus.
    Rao VS; Yeung MM; Cooke J; Salim E; Jain PK
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 105(8):745-9. PubMed ID: 22161989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.