132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29036423)
1. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma component is an independent prognosticator of poorer survival in Stage III colorectal cancer patients.
Kitagawa H; Yoshimitsu M; Kaneko M; Ibuki Y; Emi M; Kohashi T; Mukaida H; Matsuura H; Ohge H; Ohdan H; Hirabayashi N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2017 Dec; 47(12):1129-1134. PubMed ID: 29036423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colorectal cancer with invasive micropapillary components (IMPCs) shows high lymph node metastasis and a poor prognosis: A retrospective clinical study.
Guo Z; Yang Z; Li D; Tang J; Xu J; Shen H; Yuan Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 May; 99(21):e20238. PubMed ID: 32481300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinico-pathological features and prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared to invasive ductal carcinoma: a population-based study from China.
Shi WB; Yang LJ; Hu X; Zhou J; Zhang Q; Shao ZM
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e101390. PubMed ID: 24977705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Relationship between colorectal adenocarcinoma with invasive micropapillary carcinoma component and lymph node metastasis].
Tang T; Zhang XJ; Zhao LZ; Cao YJ; Xiao L; Wang RL
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 42(8):525-9. PubMed ID: 24246917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinicopathologic study of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.
Tang SL; Yang JQ; Du ZG; Tan QW; Zhou YT; Zhang D; Lv Q
Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(26):42455-42465. PubMed ID: 28418916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gastrectomy for invasive micropapillary carcinoma is associated with poorer disease-free and disease-specific survival.
Kano M; Hihara J; Kaneko M; Uemura K; Ohge H; Sueda T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Dec; 24(12):1565-1573. PubMed ID: 31327070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast overexpresses MUC4 and is associated with poor outcome to adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Mercogliano MF; Inurrigarro G; De Martino M; Venturutti L; Rivas MA; Cordo-Russo R; Proietti CJ; Fernández EA; Frahm I; Barchuk S; Allemand DH; Figurelli S; Deza EG; Ares S; Gercovich FG; Cortese E; Amasino M; Guzmán P; Roa JC; Elizalde PV; Schillaci R
BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):895. PubMed ID: 29281999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast has a better long-term survival than invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast in spite of its aggressive clinical presentations: a comparison based on large population database and case-control analysis.
Chen H; Wu K; Wang M; Wang F; Zhang M; Zhang P
Cancer Med; 2017 Dec; 6(12):2775-2786. PubMed ID: 29072365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in Prognostic Factors and Failure Patterns Between Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma and Carcinoma With Micropapillary Component Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: Retrospective Multicenter Case-Control Study (KROG 13-06).
Yu JI; Choi DH; Huh SJ; Cho EY; Kim K; Chie EK; Ha SW; Park IA; Ahn SJ; Lee JS; Shin KH; Kwon Y; Kim YB; Suh CO; Koo JS; Kim JH; Jeong BG; Kim IA; Lee JH; Park W
Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15(5):353-61.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25776197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The comparison of characters between invasive micropapillary carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma not otherwise specified of the breast].
Hua B; Lu X; Xiao WZ; He SR; Wang Z
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 55(10):770-774. PubMed ID: 29050179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of invasive micropapillary and triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Chen HL; Ding A
Breast; 2015 Dec; 24(6):723-31. PubMed ID: 26392199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast had poor clinical characteristics but showed no difference in prognosis compared with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Li G; Yang S; Yao J; Wang Z; Yao G; Liu M; Ye C
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 14(1):207. PubMed ID: 27492008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Invasive micropapillary mucinous carcinoma of the breast is associated with poor prognosis.
Liu F; Yang M; Li Z; Guo X; Lin Y; Lang R; Shen B; Pringle G; Zhang X; Fu L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 151(2):443-51. PubMed ID: 25953688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of prognosis between invasive micropapillary carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: a single center, retrospective case-control study].
Hua B; Lu X; Xiao WZ; Yang X; He SR; Wang Z
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jan; 56(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 29325355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Loss of ARID1A expression is associated with poor prognosis in invasive micropapillary carcinomas of the breast: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study with long-term survival analysis.
Onder S; Fayda M; Karanlık H; Bayram A; Şen F; Cabioglu N; Tuzlalı S; İlhan R; Yavuz E
Breast J; 2017 Nov; 23(6):638-646. PubMed ID: 28543794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical significance of perineural invasion in stages II and III colorectal cancer.
Zhou Y; Wang H; Gong H; Cao M; Zhang G; Wang Y
Pathol Res Pract; 2015 Nov; 211(11):839-44. PubMed ID: 26429129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma Compared to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma-NOS: Worse or Better?
Aker FV; Ekren E; Dogan M; Gurleyik G; Tanrikulu E; Oven BB
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2022 Sep; 32(9):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 36089720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Clinicopathological Characteristics of Pure and Mixed Invasive Micropapillary Breast Carcinomas: A Single Center Experience.
Eren Kupik G; Altundağ K
Balkan Med J; 2022 Jul; 39(4):275-281. PubMed ID: 35872645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invasive micropapillary component and its clinico-histopathological significance in patients with colorectal cancer.
Jakubowska K; Guzińska-Ustymowicz K; Pryczynicz A
Oncol Lett; 2016 Aug; 12(2):1154-1158. PubMed ID: 27446411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gastric micropapillary carcinoma: A distinct subtype with a significantly worse prognosis in TNM stages I and II.
Eom DW; Kang GH; Han SH; Cheon GJ; Han KH; Oh HS; Kim JH; Jang HJ; Hong SM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 21164291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]