661 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29036875)
1. Three novel accurate pixel-driven projection methods for 2D CT and 3D EPR imaging.
Qiao Z; Redler G; Gui Z; Qian Y; Epel B; Halpern H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(1):83-102. PubMed ID: 29036875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pixel-wise estimation of noise statistics on iterative CT reconstruction from a single scan.
Wang T; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3525-3533. PubMed ID: 28444799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization.
Harms J; Wang T; Petrongolo M; Niu T; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2676. PubMed ID: 27147376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization-based image reconstruction from sparsely sampled data in electron paramagnetic resonance imaging.
Qiao Z; Zhang Z; Pan X; Epel B; Redler G; Xia D; Halpern H
J Magn Reson; 2018 Sep; 294():24-34. PubMed ID: 30005191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac motion correction based on partial angle reconstructed images in x-ray CT.
Kim S; Chang Y; Ra JB
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2560-71. PubMed ID: 25979048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of the forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution algorithm on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric cardiac computed tomography.
Nishiyama Y; Tada K; Nishiyama Y; Mori H; Maruyama M; Katsube T; Yamamoto N; Kanayama H; Yamamoto Y; Kitagaki H
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Nov; 46(12):1663-1670. PubMed ID: 27531216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT.
Siewerdsen JH; Daly MJ; Bakhtiar B; Moseley DJ; Richard S; Keller H; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):187-97. PubMed ID: 16485425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of ray profile modeling on resolution recovery in clinical CT.
Hofmann C; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021907. PubMed ID: 24506628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Iterative image-domain decomposition for dual-energy CT.
Niu T; Dong X; Petrongolo M; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041901. PubMed ID: 24694132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptive-weighted high order TV algorithm for sparse-view CT reconstruction.
Xi Y; Zhou P; Yu H; Zhang T; Zhang L; Qiao Z; Liu F
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5568-5584. PubMed ID: 36934310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [An Error Evaluation of Iterative Image Reconstruction Methods Using Chi-Square (χ
Shinohara H; Hashimoto T
Igaku Butsuri; 2018; 38(3):113-128. PubMed ID: 30584214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-dose CT reconstruction method based on prior information of normal-dose image.
Chen Z; Zhang Q; Zhou C; Zhang M; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Liang D; Hu Z
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1091-1111. PubMed ID: 33044223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-plane artifact suppression in tomosynthesis using 3D CT image data.
Kim JG; Jin SO; Cho MH; Lee SY
Biomed Eng Online; 2011 Dec; 10():106. PubMed ID: 22151538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alpha image reconstruction (AIR): a new iterative CT image reconstruction approach using voxel-wise alpha blending.
Hofmann C; Sawall S; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061914. PubMed ID: 24877825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A metal artifact reduction method for a dental CT based on adaptive local thresholding and prior image generation.
Hegazy MA; Cho MH; Lee SY
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Nov; 15(1):119. PubMed ID: 27814775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
