593 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29036997)
1. [Mean blood pressure among the adults in China 2010-2012: based on the results of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
Yu DM; Fu P; Yu WT; Guo HJ; Yang XG; Zhao WH; Zhao LY
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 51(10):933-938. PubMed ID: 29036997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Prevalence of hypertension among 18 years old and over adults in 2010-2012 in China: based on the value of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
Zhao L; Yu D; Fu P; Yu W; Guo H; Yang X
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2018 Jan; 47(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29903215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Status of blood pressure and prevalence of hypertension among 6-17 years old children and adolescents in 2010-2012 in China].
Yu D; Xu X; Gao X; Fang H; Ju L; Guo H; Guo Q; Yu W; Jia F; Zhao L; Zhao W
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2018 Jan; 47(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 29903214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative study on electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer among adults in the field study].
Yu D; Li D; Guo Q; Yu W; Xu X; Zhao L
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Nov; 44(6):914-7. PubMed ID: 26738382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Omron RS6 wrist blood pressure monitor with the positioning sensor on or off with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer.
Deutsch C; Krüger R; Saito K; Yamashita S; Sawanoi Y; Beime B; Bramlage P
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Oct; 19(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 25000543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the ROSSMAX blood pressure measuring monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for Validation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices in Adults.
O'Brien E; Atkins N; Murphy A; Lyons S
Blood Press Monit; 2003 Dec; 8(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 14688557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of A&D UA-767 device for the self-measurement of blood pressure.
Rogoza AN; Pavlova TS; Sergeeva MV
Blood Press Monit; 2000 Aug; 5(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 11035865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Consistency between the electronic and mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents on blood pressure measuring].
Cao Q; Li D; Yu W; Guo Q; Zhao L; Yu D; Wang Y
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2016 Sep; 45(5):758-765. PubMed ID: 29903127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.
Davis GK; Roberts LM; Mangos GJ; Brown MA
J Hypertens; 2015 Mar; 33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. PubMed ID: 25380148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Blood pressure changes in 18-59 years old adults in rural area of Shanxi province, China].
Zhao YF; Li CL; Wei XY; Wen YB; Wang ZQ; Zhang M; Zhai Y; Zhang J; Song PK; Pang SJ; Yin ZX; Mi SQ; Zhao WH
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 May; 40(5):548-553. PubMed ID: 31177736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
Polo Friz H; Facchetti R; Primitz L; Beltrame L; Galbiati V; Ricioppo A; Bombelli M; Sega R
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):222-7. PubMed ID: 19741510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the JOYTECH DBP-6279B blood pressure monitor in adults and adolescents according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard(ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020).
Duan B; He L; Zhang J; Fang L; Li G
Blood Press Monit; 2023 Oct; 28(5):284-288. PubMed ID: 37434533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a smartphone auscultatory blood pressure kit Accutension XYZ-110 in adults according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2: 2013 standard.
Chu G; Zhang Z; Xu M; Huang D; Dai Q
Blood Press Monit; 2017 Oct; 22(5):290-294. PubMed ID: 28505014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of correlation between digital vs. mercury sphygmomanometer in a middle-income country: The role of socio-economic situation.
Khosravi A; Behjati M; Mansouri A; Jozan M; Mohammadifard N; Taheri M; Khodarahmi S; Ansari R; Mansouri MH; Mansouri P; Sarrafzadegan N
Clin Exp Hypertens; 2022 Feb; 44(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 34923883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
