173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29037181)
1. The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.
Odijk R; Hennipman B; Rousian M; Madani K; Dijksterhuis M; de Leeuw JW; van Hof A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):355. PubMed ID: 29037181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical equivalence of Trusynth fast
Hemalatha Devi D; Bolanthakodi C; D'Cunha P; Bheema Bai M; Kumar Moharana A; Ts D
F1000Res; 2022; 11():1179. PubMed ID: 37388624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Buresch AM; Van Arsdale A; Ferzli M; Sahasrabudhe N; Sun M; Bernstein J; Bernstein PS; Ngai IM; Garry DJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 130(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 28796687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of suture material in hypertrophic scar formation: Monocryl vs. Vicryl-rapide.
Niessen FB; Spauwen PH; Kon M
Ann Plast Surg; 1997 Sep; 39(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 9326705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous versus interrupted episiotomy repair with monofilament or multifilament absorbed suture materials: a randomised controlled trial.
Kokanalı D; Ugur M; Kuntay Kokanalı M; Karayalcın R; Tonguc E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 20680312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of the healing process when using Vicryl®, Vicryl Rapid®, Vicryl Plus®, and Monocryl® sutures in the rat dermal tissue.
Gartti-Jardim EC; de Souza AP; Carvalho AC; Pereira CC; Okamoto R; Magro Filho O
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 17(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 23269361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ear acupuncture or local anaesthetics as pain relief during postpartum surgical repair: a randomised controlled trial.
Kindberg S; Klünder L; Strøm J; Henriksen TB
BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 19120322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic suturing: effect of instrument handling on suture strength.
Bariol SV; Stewart GD; Tolley DA
J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 16283852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Perineal tears and episiotomy: Surgical procedure - CNGOF perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics guidelines].
Marty N; Verspyck E
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Dec; 46(12):948-967. PubMed ID: 30392991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized trial between different suture materials (polydioxanone vs. poliglecaprone 25) and different suturing techniques (running subcuticular suture alone vs. with running horizontal mattress) in prevention of hypertrophic scar development in median sternotomy wound.
Homvises B
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Aug; 97 Suppl 8():S88-94. PubMed ID: 25518299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Delayed Wound Dehiscence of Anterior Knee Incisions in Patients Aged 20 Years and Younger: A Comparison of Subcutaneous Skin Closure.
Salib CG; Smith JC; Siow N; Luhmann SJ
J Pediatr Orthop; 2017 Dec; 37(8):543-546. PubMed ID: 26650578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 2. A randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair.
Mackrodt C; Gordon B; Fern E; Ayers S; Truesdale A; Grant A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Apr; 105(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 9609273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Equivalence of Monoglyde® and Monocryl® Absorbable Poliglecaprone-25 Sutures: A Single-Blind, Randomized Study.
Sailakshmi M; Misra S; Hs S; Acharya S; Moharana AK; Ts D
Cureus; 2023 May; 15(5):e38938. PubMed ID: 37309337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ
Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.
Jiang H; Qian X; Carroli G; Garner P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 2(2):CD000081. PubMed ID: 28176333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial.
Sharma C; Sharma S; Soni A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Feb; 6(2):101256. PubMed ID: 38109995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postpartum perineal repair performed by midwives: a randomised trial comparing two suture techniques leaving the skin unsutured.
Kindberg S; Stehouwer M; Hvidman L; Henriksen TB
BJOG; 2008 Mar; 115(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 18271883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between two incision angles of mediolateral episiotomy in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial.
El-Din AS; Kamal MM; Amin MA
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1877-82. PubMed ID: 25056465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Episiotomy techniques].
Verspyck E; Sentilhes L; Roman H; Sergent F; Marpeau L
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb; 35(1 Suppl):1S40-1S51. PubMed ID: 16495826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
