130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29037465)
21. Weak effect of metal type and ica genes on staphylococcal infection of titanium and stainless steel implants.
Hudetz D; Ursic Hudetz S; Harris LG; Luginbühl R; Friederich NF; Landmann R
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2008 Dec; 14(12):1135-45. PubMed ID: 19046165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Activity of N-acetyl-L-cysteine against biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on orthopedic prosthetic materials.
Drago L; De Vecchi E; Mattina R; Romanò CL
Int J Artif Organs; 2013 Jan; 36(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 23280076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Disclosing Agents for the Intraoperative Identification of Biofilms on Orthopedic Implants.
Parry JA; Karau MJ; Kakar S; Hanssen AD; Patel R; Abdel MP
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Aug; 32(8):2501-2504. PubMed ID: 28420544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biofilm growth on implants: bacteria prefer plasma coats.
Wagner C; Aytac S; Hänsch GM
Int J Artif Organs; 2011 Sep; 34(9):811-7. PubMed ID: 22094560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimization of an automatic counting system for the quantification of Staphylococcus epidermidis cells in biofilms.
Freitas AI; Vasconcelos C; Vilanova M; Cerca N
J Basic Microbiol; 2014 Jul; 54(7):750-7. PubMed ID: 23686681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improved detection of biofilm-formative bacteria by vortexing and sonication: a pilot study.
Kobayashi H; Oethinger M; Tuohy MJ; Procop GW; Bauer TW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 May; 467(5):1360-4. PubMed ID: 18989729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ability of Three Lactic Acid Bacteria to Grow in Sessile Mode and to Inhibit Biofilm Formation of Pathogenic Bacteria.
Benmouna Z; Dalache F; Zadi-Karam H; Karam NE; Vuotto C
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2020; 1282():105-114. PubMed ID: 32034730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biofilm Antimicrobial Susceptibility Increases With Antimicrobial Exposure Time.
Castaneda P; McLaren A; Tavaziva G; Overstreet D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jul; 474(7):1659-64. PubMed ID: 26797908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Differential effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on biofilm formation by different strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Pihl M; Davies JR; Chávez de Paz LE; Svensäter G
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 59(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 20528934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Susceptibility of Vascular Implants to Colonization in vitro by Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Woźniak W; Kozińska A; Ciostek P; Sitkiewicz I
Pol J Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 66(1):125-129. PubMed ID: 29359697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from patients with urinary tract infections (1996). I. Susceptibility distribution].
Kumamoto Y; Tsukamoto T; Hirose T; Yokoo A; Shigeta S; Takahashi T; Shiraiwa Y; Ogiwara M; Yoshida H; Imafuku Y; Murai M; Watanabe K; Uchida H; Kobayashi Y; Matsuda S; Fujime M; Fujita K; Igari J; Oguri T; Yamaguchi K; Matsumoto T; Kashitani F; Kaku M; Ooe H; Mochida C
Jpn J Antibiot; 1998 Feb; 51(2):69-111. PubMed ID: 9575437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Complete Eradication of Biofilm From Orthopedic Materials.
Leary JT; Werger MM; Broach WH; Shaw LN; Santoni BG; Bernasek TL; Lyons ST
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Aug; 32(8):2513-2518. PubMed ID: 28434696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of MBEC™-HTP biofilm model for studies of implant associated infections.
Coraça-Hubér DC; Fille M; Hausdorfer J; Pfaller K; Nogler M
J Orthop Res; 2012 Jul; 30(7):1176-80. PubMed ID: 22228044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Co-Culture of S. epidermidis and Human Osteoblasts on Implant Surfaces: An Advanced In Vitro Model for Implant-Associated Infections.
Zaatreh S; Wegner K; Strauß M; Pasold J; Mittelmeier W; Podbielski A; Kreikemeyer B; Bader R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151534. PubMed ID: 26982194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A novel polytetrafluoroethylene-channel model, which simulates low levels of culturable bacteria in buildup biofilm after repeated endoscope reprocessing.
Alfa MJ; Ribeiro MM; da Costa Luciano C; Franca R; Olson N; DeGagne P; Singh H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):442-451.e1. PubMed ID: 28551023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro activity of the Qoustic Wound Therapy System against planktonic and biofilm bacteria.
Karau MJ; Piper KE; Steckelberg JM; Kavros SJ; Patel R
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2010 Jul; 23(7):316-20. PubMed ID: 20562540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Do crosslinking and vitamin E stabilization influence microbial adhesions on UHMWPE-based biomaterials?
Banche G; Bracco P; Allizond V; Bistolfi A; Boffano M; Cimino A; Brach del Prever EM; Cuffini AM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):974-86. PubMed ID: 25367109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prevention of initial biofilm formation on ureteral stents using a sustained releasing varnish containing chlorhexidine: in vitro study.
Zelichenko G; Steinberg D; Lorber G; Friedman M; Zaks B; Lavy E; Hidas G; Landau EH; Gofrit ON; Pode D; Duvdevani M
J Endourol; 2013 Mar; 27(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 22970837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biofilm formation on bone grafts and bone graft substitutes: comparison of different materials by a standard in vitro test and microcalorimetry.
Clauss M; Trampuz A; Borens O; Bohner M; Ilchmann T
Acta Biomater; 2010 Sep; 6(9):3791-7. PubMed ID: 20226886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Absence of bactericidal effect of focused shock waves on an in-vitro biofilm model of an implant.
Madron MS; McClure SR; Griffith RW; Wang C
Can J Vet Res; 2012 Apr; 76(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 23024455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]