496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29037481)
21. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic surgical staging for early-stage endometrial cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Nam JH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 24407582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial.
Mourits MJ; Bijen CB; Arts HJ; ter Brugge HG; van der Sijde R; Paulsen L; Wijma J; Bongers MY; Post WJ; van der Zee AG; de Bock GH
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Aug; 11(8):763-71. PubMed ID: 20638901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers.
Malinowski A; Majchrzak-Baczmańska D; Pogoda K; Maciołek-Blewniewska G; Antosiak B
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 23700847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of disease recurrence between robotic versus laparotomy approach in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
Song J; Le T; Hopkins L; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Lupe K; Gaudet M; E C; Samant R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Feb; 30(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 31871112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.
Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a multicentric study.
Holub Z; Jabor A; Bartos P; Eim J; Urbánek S; Pivovarniková R
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 12214729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pseudovascular Invasion: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometrial Cancer.
Seifi F; Parkash V; Clark M; Menderes G; Tierney C; Silasi DA; Azodi M
JSLS; 2019; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 31285650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Safety of perioperative aspirin therapy in minimally invasive endometrial cancer staging.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):636-41. PubMed ID: 24462596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.
Devaja O; Samara I; Papadopoulos AJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 May; 20(4):570-5. PubMed ID: 20686375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.
Nasioudis D; Frey MK; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo TA; Holcomb K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 32276935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Adoption of Single-port Laparoscopy for Full Staging of Endometrial Cancer: Surgical and Oncology Outcomes and Evaluation of the Learning Curve.
Barnes H; Harrison R; Huffman L; Medlin E; Spencer R; Al-Niaimi A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):1029-1036. PubMed ID: 28662990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Recurrence and survival after laparoscopy versus laparotomy without lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: Long-term outcomes of a randomised trial.
Reijntjes B; van Suijlichem M; Woolderink JM; Bongers MY; Reesink-Peters N; Paulsen L; van der Hurk PJ; Kraayenbrink AA; Apperloo MJA; Slangen B; Schukken T; Tummers FHMP; van Kesteren PJM; Huirne JAF; Boskamp D; Lunter G; de Bock GH; Mourits MJE
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 164(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 34955237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative Surgical Outcomes for Endometrial Cancer Patients 65 Years Old or Older Staged With Robotics or Laparotomy.
Doo DW; Guntupalli SR; Corr BR; Sheeder J; Davidson SA; Behbakht K; Jarrett MJ; Guy MS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(11):3687-94. PubMed ID: 25672563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minimally invasive staging of endometrial cancer is feasible and safe in elderly women.
Frey MK; Ihnow SB; Worley MJ; Heyman KP; Kessler R; Slomovitz BM; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 21354065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Postoperative complications of epidural analgesia at hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancies: an analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Ackroyd SA; Hernandez E; Roberts ME; Chu C; Rubin S; Mantia-Smaldone G; Houck K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1203-1209. PubMed ID: 32457094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
