These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29038071)

  • 21. Changes in the use of effective and long-acting reversible contraception in Vietnam.
    Asad S; Hebert C; Andridge R; Nguyen N; Gallo MF
    Contraception; 2019 Mar; 99(3):165-169. PubMed ID: 30503505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Projections and opinions from 100 experts in long-acting reversible contraception.
    Foster DG; Barar R; Gould H; Gomez I; Nguyen D; Biggs MA
    Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):543-52. PubMed ID: 26515195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contraceptive use in Canada, 1984.
    Balakrishnan TR; Krotki K; Lapierre-Adamcyk E
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(5):209-15. PubMed ID: 3842662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contraceptive failure rates: new estimates from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
    Fu H; Darroch JE; Haas T; Ranjit N
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 10224543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contraceptive failure in the United States: estimates from the 1982 National Survey of Family Growth.
    Grady WR; Hayward MD; Yagi J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1986; 18(5):200-9. PubMed ID: 3803556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Unintended pregnancy risk and contraceptive use among women 45-50 years old: Massachusetts, 2006, 2008, and 2010.
    Godfrey EM; Zapata LB; Cox CM; Curtis KM; Marchbanks PA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 214(6):712.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26694134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trends and regional variations in provision of contraception methods in a commercially insured population in the United States based on nationally proposed measures.
    Law A; Yu JS; Wang W; Lin J; Lynen R
    Contraception; 2017 Sep; 96(3):175-182. PubMed ID: 28596122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Current Contraceptive Status Among Women Aged 15-49: United States, 2017-2019.
    Daniels K; Abma JC
    NCHS Data Brief; 2020 Oct; (388):1-8. PubMed ID: 33151146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Choice of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, etonogestrel implant or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception after aspiration abortion.
    Steinauer JE; Upadhyay UD; Sokoloff A; Harper CC; Diedrich JT; Drey EA
    Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 26093190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Women's contraceptive attitudes and use in 1992.
    Forrest JD; Fordyce RR
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1993; 25(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 8405344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Trends in contraceptive use.
    Darroch JE
    Contraception; 2013 Mar; 87(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 23040137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use: results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
    Trussell J; Vaughan B
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):64-72, 93. PubMed ID: 10224544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changing Patterns of Contraceptive Use and the Decline in Rates of Pregnancy and Birth Among U.S. Adolescents, 2007-2014.
    Lindberg LD; Santelli JS; Desai S
    J Adolesc Health; 2018 Aug; 63(2):253-256. PubMed ID: 30149926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of Contraception and Attitudes towards Contraceptive Use in Swedish Women--A Nationwide Survey.
    Kopp Kallner H; Thunell L; Brynhildsen J; Lindeberg M; Gemzell Danielsson K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125990. PubMed ID: 25992901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008.
    Mosher WD; Jones J
    Vital Health Stat 23; 2010 Aug; (29):1-44. PubMed ID: 20939159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of contraception among reproductive-aged women in the United States, 2014 and 2016.
    Kavanaugh ML; Pliskin E
    F S Rep; 2020 Sep; 1(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 34223223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trends of contraception use among married reproductive age women: Tehran lipid and glucose cohort study 2002-2011.
    Behboudi-Gandevani S; Ramezani Tehrani F; Cheraghi L; Noroozzadeh M; Farahmand M; Azizi F
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2017 Jun; 12():116-122. PubMed ID: 28477923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using Longitudinal Data to Understand Changes in Consistent Contraceptive Use.
    Jones RK; Tapales A; Lindberg LD; Frost J
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2015 Sep; 47(3):131-9. PubMed ID: 26287965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Examining quality of contraceptive services for adolescents in Oregon's family planning program.
    Rodriguez MI; Darney BG; Elman E; Linz R; Caughey AB; McConnell KJ
    Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 25545334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contraceptive use and fertility in Guatemala.
    Monteith RS; Anderson JE; Pineda MA; Santiso R; Oberle M
    Stud Fam Plann; 1985; 16(5):279-88. PubMed ID: 4060213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.