These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29038130)

  • 1. Handling time varying confounding in observational research.
    Mansournia MA; Etminan M; Danaei G; Kaufman JS; Collins G
    BMJ; 2017 Oct; 359():j4587. PubMed ID: 29038130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding Confounding in Observational Studies.
    Meuli L; Dick F
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2018 May; 55(5):737. PubMed ID: 29526654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opportunities for minimization of confounding in observational research.
    Quartey G; Feudjo-Tepie M; Wang J; Kim J
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(6):539-47. PubMed ID: 22127842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the E-Value to Assess the Potential Effect of Unmeasured Confounding in Observational Studies.
    Haneuse S; VanderWeele TJ; Arterburn D
    JAMA; 2019 Feb; 321(6):602-603. PubMed ID: 30676631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpretation of observational studies.
    Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):815-7. PubMed ID: 25432264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding: E-Values for Observational Studies.
    Localio AR; Stack CB; Griswold ME
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Aug; 167(4):285-286. PubMed ID: 28693037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The end of biomedical journals: there is madness in their methods.
    Aickin M
    J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):755-7. PubMed ID: 16296895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistics in Brief: An Introduction to the Use of Propensity Scores.
    Inacio MC; Chen Y; Paxton EW; Namba RS; Kurtz SM; Cafri G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2722-6. PubMed ID: 25773902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Classification bias in epidemiological studies].
    Zieliński A
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2008; 62(2):461-70. PubMed ID: 18807495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Bias in observational research: 'confounding'].
    Groenwold RH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(13):A4221. PubMed ID: 22456291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indication for treatment can introduce bias in observational studies of surgical treatment.
    Holmberg L; Steineck G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1993 Jun; 19(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 8314378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Causal inference in perioperative medicine observational research: part 1, a graphical introduction.
    Krishnamoorthy V; Wong DJN; Wilson M; Raghunathan K; Ohnuma T; McLean D; Moonesinghe SR; Harris SK
    Br J Anaesth; 2020 Sep; 125(3):393-397. PubMed ID: 32600803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Major Sources of Bias.
    Meuli L; Dick F
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2018 May; 55(5):736. PubMed ID: 29525740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do as you would be done by: write as you would wish to read.
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Exp Physiol; 2013 Feb; 98(2):355-8. PubMed ID: 23349529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causal inference in perioperative medicine observational research: part 2, advanced methods.
    Krishnamoorthy V; McLean D; Ohnuma T; Harris SK; Wong DJN; Wilson M; Moonesinghe R; Raghunathan K
    Br J Anaesth; 2020 Sep; 125(3):398-405. PubMed ID: 32527658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical Power for Trend-in-trend Design.
    Ertefaie A; Small DS; Ji X; Leonard C; Hennessy S
    Epidemiology; 2018 May; 29(3):e21-e23. PubMed ID: 29337845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guideline.
    Pouwels KB; Widyakusuma NN; Groenwold RH; Hak E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():217-24. PubMed ID: 26327488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observational research databases in renal disease.
    Shlipak M; Stehman-Breen C
    J Am Soc Nephrol; 2005 Dec; 16(12):3477-84. PubMed ID: 16280468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].
    Touzet S; Colin C
    Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matched, equal, equipoise.
    Tuncay OC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):526-7. PubMed ID: 26432301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.