These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29038144)

  • 1. Genetic Gain Increases by Applying the Usefulness Criterion with Improved Variance Prediction in Selection of Crosses.
    Lehermeier C; Teyssèdre S; Schön CC
    Genetics; 2017 Dec; 207(4):1651-1661. PubMed ID: 29038144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usefulness Criterion and Post-selection Parental Contributions in Multi-parental Crosses: Application to Polygenic Trait Introgression.
    Allier A; Moreau L; Charcosset A; Teyssèdre S; Lehermeier C
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 May; 9(5):1469-1479. PubMed ID: 30819823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategies for Selecting Crosses Using Genomic Prediction in Two Wheat Breeding Programs.
    Lado B; Battenfield S; Guzmán C; Quincke M; Singh RP; Dreisigacker S; Peña RJ; Fritz A; Silva P; Poland J; Gutiérrez L
    Plant Genome; 2017 Jul; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 28724066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic mating in outbred species: predicting cross usefulness with additive and total genetic covariance matrices.
    Wolfe MD; Chan AW; Kulakow P; Rabbi I; Jannink JL
    Genetics; 2021 Nov; 219(3):. PubMed ID: 34740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection on Expected Maximum Haploid Breeding Values Can Increase Genetic Gain in Recurrent Genomic Selection.
    Müller D; Schopp P; Melchinger AE
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Mar; 8(4):1173-1181. PubMed ID: 29434032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of genomic-enabled cross selection criteria for the improvement of inbred line breeding populations.
    Danguy des Déserts A; Durand N; Servin B; Goudemand-Dugué E; Alliot JM; Ruiz D; Charmet G; Elsen JM; Bouchet S
    G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 37625792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploids. IV. Number versus size of crosses and importance of parental selection in two-stage selection for testcross performance.
    Wegenast T; Longin CF; Utz HF; Melchinger AE; Maurer HP; Reif JC
    Theor Appl Genet; 2008 Jul; 117(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 18438638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic selection of crossing partners on basis of the expected mean and variance of their derived lines.
    Osthushenrich T; Frisch M; Herzog E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0188839. PubMed ID: 29200436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Best linear unbiased prediction and optimum allocation of test resources in maize breeding with doubled haploids.
    Mi X; Wegenast T; Utz HF; Dhillon BS; Melchinger AE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2011 Jun; 123(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21547486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of Means and Variances of Crosses With Genome-Wide Marker Effects in Barley.
    Osthushenrich T; Frisch M; Zenke-Philippi C; Jaiser H; Spiller M; Cselényi L; Krumnacker K; Boxberger S; Kopahnke D; Habekuß A; Ordon F; Herzog E
    Front Plant Sci; 2018; 9():1899. PubMed ID: 30627135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection on Optimal Haploid Value Increases Genetic Gain and Preserves More Genetic Diversity Relative to Genomic Selection.
    Daetwyler HD; Hayden MJ; Spangenberg GC; Hayes BJ
    Genetics; 2015 Aug; 200(4):1341-8. PubMed ID: 26092719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Short- and Long-Term Genetic Gain by Accounting for Within-Family Variance in Optimal Cross-Selection.
    Allier A; Lehermeier C; Charcosset A; Moreau L; Teyssèdre S
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():1006. PubMed ID: 31737033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accounting for Genotype-by-Environment Interactions and Residual Genetic Variation in Genomic Selection for Water-Soluble Carbohydrate Concentration in Wheat.
    Ovenden B; Milgate A; Wade LJ; Rebetzke GJ; Holland JB
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 May; 8(6):1909-1919. PubMed ID: 29661842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward integration of genomic selection with crop modelling: the development of an integrated approach to predicting rice heading dates.
    Onogi A; Watanabe M; Mochizuki T; Hayashi T; Nakagawa H; Hasegawa T; Iwata H
    Theor Appl Genet; 2016 Apr; 129(4):805-817. PubMed ID: 26791836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
    Xu S; Zhu D; Zhang Q
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(34):12456-61. PubMed ID: 25114224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving selection decisions with mating information by accounting for Mendelian sampling variances looking two generations ahead.
    Niehoff TAM; Ten Napel J; Bijma P; Pook T; Wientjes YCJ; Hegedűs B; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2024 May; 56(1):41. PubMed ID: 38773363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
    Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Potential of Genome-Wide Prediction to Support Parental Selection, Evaluated with Data from a Commercial Barley Breeding Program.
    Rembe M; Zhao Y; Wendler N; Oldach K; Korzun V; Reif JC
    Plants (Basel); 2022 Sep; 11(19):. PubMed ID: 36235430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.