BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29038595)

  • 1. Covariate selection for association screening in multiphenotype genetic studies.
    Aschard H; Guillemot V; Vilhjalmsson B; Patel CJ; Skurnik D; Ye CJ; Wolpin B; Kraft P; Zaitlen N
    Nat Genet; 2017 Dec; 49(12):1789-1795. PubMed ID: 29038595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MARS: leveraging allelic heterogeneity to increase power of association testing.
    Hormozdiari F; Jung J; Eskin E; J Joo JW
    Genome Biol; 2021 Apr; 22(1):128. PubMed ID: 33931127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Backward genotype-transcript-phenotype association mapping.
    Lee S; Wang H; Xing EP
    Methods; 2017 Oct; 129():18-23. PubMed ID: 28917724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phenotypic complexity, measurement bias, and poor phenotypic resolution contribute to the missing heritability problem in genetic association studies.
    van der Sluis S; Verhage M; Posthuma D; Dolan CV
    PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13929. PubMed ID: 21085666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model-based assessment of replicability for genome-wide association meta-analysis.
    McGuire D; Jiang Y; Liu M; Weissenkampen JD; Eckert S; Yang L; Chen F; ; Berg A; Vrieze S; Jiang B; Li Q; Liu DJ
    Nat Commun; 2021 Mar; 12(1):1964. PubMed ID: 33785739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the power of genetic association tests with imperfect phenotype derived from electronic medical records.
    Sinnott JA; Dai W; Liao KP; Shaw SY; Ananthakrishnan AN; Gainer VS; Karlson EW; Churchill S; Szolovits P; Murphy S; Kohane I; Plenge R; Cai T
    Hum Genet; 2014 Nov; 133(11):1369-82. PubMed ID: 25062868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting sample misidentifications in genetic association studies.
    Ekstrøm CT; Feenstra B
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012; 11(3):Article 13. PubMed ID: 22611595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simultaneous Modeling of Disease Status and Clinical Phenotypes To Increase Power in Genome-Wide Association Studies.
    Bilow M; Crespo F; Pan Z; Eskin E; Eyheramendy S
    Genetics; 2017 Mar; 205(3):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 28132020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of adaptive multiple phenotype association tests using summary statistics in genome-wide association studies.
    Sitlani CM; Baldassari AR; Highland HM; Hodonsky CJ; McKnight B; Avery CL
    Hum Mol Genet; 2021 Jul; 30(15):1371-1383. PubMed ID: 33949650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Matching whole genomes to rare genetic disorders: Identification of potential causative variants using phenotype-weighted knowledge in the CAGI SickKids5 clinical genomes challenge.
    Pal LR; Kundu K; Yin Y; Moult J
    Hum Mutat; 2020 Feb; 41(2):347-362. PubMed ID: 31680375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semiparametric Allelic Tests for Mapping Multiple Phenotypes: Binomial Regression and Mahalanobis Distance.
    Majumdar A; Witte JS; Ghosh S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 39(8):635-50. PubMed ID: 26493781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imputing Phenotypes for Genome-wide Association Studies.
    Hormozdiari F; Kang EY; Bilow M; Ben-David E; Vulpe C; McLachlan S; Lusis AJ; Han B; Eskin E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jul; 99(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 27292110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Powerful rare variant association testing in a copula-based joint analysis of multiple phenotypes.
    Konigorski S; Yilmaz YE; Janke J; Bergmann MM; Boeing H; Pischon T
    Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 44(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 31732979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kinship Solutions for Partially Observed Multiphenotype Data.
    Elliott LT
    J Comput Biol; 2020 Sep; 27(9):1461-1470. PubMed ID: 32159382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies.
    Tam V; Patel N; Turcotte M; Bossé Y; Paré G; Meyre D
    Nat Rev Genet; 2019 Aug; 20(8):467-484. PubMed ID: 31068683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. TATES: efficient multivariate genotype-phenotype analysis for genome-wide association studies.
    van der Sluis S; Posthuma D; Dolan CV
    PLoS Genet; 2013; 9(1):e1003235. PubMed ID: 23359524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the Calibration and Power of Three Gene-Based Association Tests of Rare Variants for the X Chromosome.
    Ma C; Boehnke M; Lee S;
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 39(7):499-508. PubMed ID: 26454253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multivariate Analysis of Genotype-Phenotype Association.
    Mitteroecker P; Cheverud JM; Pavlicev M
    Genetics; 2016 Apr; 202(4):1345-63. PubMed ID: 26896328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method to estimate the contribution of regional genetic associations to complex traits from summary association statistics.
    Pare G; Mao S; Deng WQ
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27644. PubMed ID: 27273519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calculating Power to Detect Maternal and Offspring Genetic Effects in Genetic Association Studies.
    Moen GH; Hemani G; Warrington NM; Evans DM
    Behav Genet; 2019 May; 49(3):327-339. PubMed ID: 30600410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.