These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29039251)

  • 21. Should I have been more careful or less careless? The comparative nature of counterfactual thoughts alters judgments of their impact.
    Woltin KA; Epstude K
    Cognition; 2023 Jun; 235():105402. PubMed ID: 36801604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Close counterfactuals and almost doing the impossible.
    Doan T; Denison S; Friedman O
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):187-195. PubMed ID: 37488463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Eye movements reveal rapid concurrent access to factual and counterfactual interpretations of the world.
    Ferguson HJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(5):939-61. PubMed ID: 22313036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Causal responsibility and counterfactuals.
    Lagnado DA; Gerstenberg T; Zultan R
    Cogn Sci; 2013 Aug; 37(6):1036-73. PubMed ID: 23855451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Relation Between Factual and Counterfactual Conditionals.
    Quelhas AC; Rasga C; Johnson-Laird PN
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Sep; 42(7):2205-2228. PubMed ID: 29998570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multivariate fMRI and Eye Tracking Reveal Differential Effects of Visual Interference on Recognition Memory Judgments for Objects and Scenes.
    O'Neil EB; Watson HC; Dhillon S; Lobaugh NJ; Lee AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1708-22. PubMed ID: 25848685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is making a risky choice based on a weighting and adding process? An eye-tracking investigation.
    Su Y; Rao LL; Sun HY; Du XL; Li X; Li S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1765-80. PubMed ID: 23687917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Strategies and pseudoneglect on luminance judgments: An eye-tracking investigation.
    Voyer D; Saint-Aubin J; Cook C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1789-98. PubMed ID: 25151102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Counterfactuals and the logic of causal selection.
    Quillien T; Lucas CG
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37289508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Causal judgment from contingency information: the interpretation of factors common to all instances.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1083-102. PubMed ID: 11009246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Expectations affect physical causation judgments.
    Gerstenberg T; Icard T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 31512904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. If and or: Real and counterfactual possibilities in their truth and probability.
    Byrne RMJ; Johnson-Laird PN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):760-780. PubMed ID: 31647286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Counterfactual Thought.
    Byrne RM
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():135-57. PubMed ID: 26393873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of belief and logic on syllogistic reasoning: Eye-movement evidence for selective processing models.
    Ball LJ; Phillips P; Wade CN; Quayle JD
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 16610275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Confidence and gradation in causal judgment.
    O'Neill K; Henne P; Bello P; Pearson J; De Brigard F
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():105036. PubMed ID: 35092903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When do we think that X caused Y?
    Quillien T
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104410. PubMed ID: 32768136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A counterfactual explanation for the action effect in causal judgment.
    Henne P; Niemi L; Pinillos Á; De Brigard F; Knobe J
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():157-164. PubMed ID: 31082750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lucky or clever? From expectations to responsibility judgments.
    Gerstenberg T; Ullman TD; Nagel J; Kleiman-Weiner M; Lagnado DA; Tenenbaum JB
    Cognition; 2018 Aug; 177():122-141. PubMed ID: 29677593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predicting responsibility judgments from dispositional inferences and causal attributions.
    Langenhoff AF; Wiegmann A; Halpern JY; Tenenbaum JB; Gerstenberg T
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Sep; 129():101412. PubMed ID: 34303092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Primacy in causal strength judgments: the effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships.
    Dennis MJ; Ahn WK
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jan; 29(1):152-64. PubMed ID: 11277458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.