BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29040021)

  • 1. Flexible Sigmoidoscopy and CT Colonography Screening: Patients' Experience with and Factors for Undergoing Screening-Insight from the Proteus Colon Trial.
    Senore C; Correale L; Regge D; Hassan C; Iussich G; Silvani M; Arrigoni A; Morra L; Segnan N
    Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):873-883. PubMed ID: 29040021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing CT colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial within a population-based screening programme.
    Regge D; Iussich G; Segnan N; Correale L; Hassan C; Arrigoni A; Asnaghi R; Bestagini P; Bulighin G; Cassinis MC; Ederle A; Ferraris A; Galatola G; Gallo T; Gandini G; Garretti L; Martina MC; Molinar D; Montemezzi S; Morra L; Motton M; Occhipinti P; Pinali L; Soardi GA; Senore C
    Gut; 2017 Aug; 66(8):1434-1440. PubMed ID: 27196588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.
    Regge D; Iussich G; Senore C; Correale L; Hassan C; Bert A; Montemezzi S; Segnan N
    Trials; 2014 Mar; 15():97. PubMed ID: 24678896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acceptability and side-effects of colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in a screening setting.
    Senore C; Ederle A; Fantin A; Andreoni B; Bisanti L; Grazzini G; Zappa M; Ferrero F; Marutti A; Giuliani O; Armaroli P; Segnan N
    J Med Screen; 2011; 18(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 22045821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing different strategies for colorectal cancer screening in Italy: predictors of patients' participation.
    Senore C; Armaroli P; Silvani M; Andreoni B; Bisanti L; Marai L; Castiglione G; Grazzini G; Taddei S; Gasperoni S; Giuliani O; Malfitana G; Marutti A; Genta G; Segnan N
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 105(1):188-98. PubMed ID: 19826409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single CT colonography versus three rounds of faecal immunochemical test for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (SAVE): a randomised controlled trial.
    Sali L; Ventura L; Mascalchi M; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Carozzi F; Milani S; Zappa M; Grazzini G; Mantellini P
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 36116454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Faecal immunochemical test in subjects not attending screening computed tomography colonography and colonoscopy in a randomized trial.
    Sali L; Ventura L; Mascalchi M; Falchini M; Mantellini P; Delsanto S; Milani S; Zappa M; Grazzini G
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Mar; 27(2):105-109. PubMed ID: 27428397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial.
    de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Thomeer M; Essink-Bot ML; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Stoker J; Dekker E
    Gut; 2012 Nov; 61(11):1552-9. PubMed ID: 22198714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Update on Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, Computed Tomographic Colonography, and Capsule Colonoscopy.
    Chung SW; Hakim S; Siddiqui S; Cash BD
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2020 Jul; 30(3):569-583. PubMed ID: 32439089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-reported outcomes following flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in a demonstration screening programme in the UK.
    Robb KA; Lo SH; Power E; Kralj-Hans I; Edwards R; Vance M; von Wagner C; Atkin W; Wardle J
    J Med Screen; 2012 Dec; 19(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 23486697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
    Stoop EM; de Haan MC; de Wijkerslooth TR; Bossuyt PM; van Ballegooijen M; Nio CY; van de Vijver MJ; Biermann K; Thomeer M; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Stoker J; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E
    Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jan; 13(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 22088831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non- or full-laxative CT colonography vs. endoscopic tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomised survey comparing public perceptions and intentions to undergo testing.
    Ghanouni A; Halligan S; Plumb A; Boone D; Wardle J; von Wagner C
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1477-86. PubMed ID: 24817084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.
    Regge D; Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
    Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 19188317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.
    Graser A; Stieber P; Nagel D; Schäfer C; Horst D; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Lottes A; Geisbüsch S; Kramer H; Wagner AC; Diepolder H; Schirra J; Roth HJ; Seidel D; Göke B; Reiser MF; Kolligs FT
    Gut; 2009 Feb; 58(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 18852257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acceptability of two colorectal cancer screening tests: pain as a key determinant in sigmoidoscopy.
    Kirkøen B; Berstad P; Botteri E; Dalén E; Nilsen JA; Hoff G; de Lange T; Bernklev T
    Endoscopy; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1075-1086. PubMed ID: 28938500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer.
    Hall N; Birt L; Rees CJ; Walter FM; Elliot S; Ritchie M; Weller D; Rubin G
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012304. PubMed ID: 27836872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Performance and Patient Acceptance of Reduced-Laxative CT Colonography for the Detection of Polypoid and Non-Polypoid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Prospective Trial.
    Utano K; Nagata K; Honda T; Mitsushima T; Yasuda T; Kato T; Horita S; Asano M; Oda N; Majima K; Kawamura Y; Hirayama M; Watanabe N; Kanazawa H; Lefor AK; Sugimoto H
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 27580426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening: risks and benefits.
    Pox CP; Schmiegel W
    Gut; 2010 May; 59(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 20427403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT colonography: accuracy, acceptance, safety and position in organised population screening.
    de Haan MC; Pickhardt PJ; Stoker J
    Gut; 2015 Feb; 64(2):342-50. PubMed ID: 25468258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients' experience of screening CT colonography with reduced and full bowel preparation in a randomised trial.
    Sali L; Ventura L; Grazzini G; Borgheresi A; Delsanto S; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Mantellini P; Milani S; Pallanti S; Zappa M; Mascalchi M
    Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2457-2464. PubMed ID: 30402705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.