These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29040039)

  • 1. Breast Cancer Risk Associations with Digital Mammographic Density by Pixel Brightness Threshold and Mammographic System.
    Nguyen TL; Choi YH; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh NH; Li S; Dite GS; Kim MS; Brennan PC; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Song YM; Hopper JL
    Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):433-442. PubMed ID: 29040039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.
    Keller BM; Chen J; Daye D; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of breast cancer with quantitative mammographic density measures for women receiving contrast-enhanced mammography.
    Watt GP; Keshavamurthy KN; Nguyen TL; Lobbes MBI; Jochelson MS; Sung JS; Moskowitz CS; Patel P; Liang X; Woods M; Hopper JL; Pike MC; Bernstein JL
    JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2024 Apr; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38565262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of type of full-field digital image on mammographic density assessment and breast cancer risk estimation: a case-control study.
    Busana MC; Eng A; Denholm R; Dowsett M; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Dos-Santos-Silva I
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):96. PubMed ID: 27670914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk in Western Australian Aboriginal women.
    Darcey E; Lloyd R; Cadby G; Pilkington L; Redfern A; Thompson SC; Saunders C; Wylie E; Stone J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 176(1):235-242. PubMed ID: 30977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure.
    Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Maskarinec G; Li S; Dite GS; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh HN; Baglietto L; Stone J; Song YM; Sung J; MacInnis RJ; Dugué PA; Dowty JG; Jenkins MA; Milne RL; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Int J Cancer; 2021 May; 148(9):2193-2202. PubMed ID: 33197272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women.
    Habel LA; Alexeeff SE; Achacoso N; Arasu VA; Gastounioti A; Gerstley L; Klein RJ; Liang RY; Lipson JA; Mankowski W; Margolies LR; Rothstein JH; Rubin DL; Shen L; Sistig A; Song X; Villaseñor MA; Westley M; Whittemore AS; Yaffe MJ; Wang P; Kontos D; Sieh W
    Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Aug; 25(1):92. PubMed ID: 37544983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Dembrower K; Liu Y; Azizpour H; Eklund M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Strand F
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 31845842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of contralateral breast cancer risk with mammographic density defined at higher-than-conventional intensity thresholds.
    Watt GP; Knight JA; Nguyen TL; Reiner AS; Malone KE; John EM; Lynch CF; Brooks JD; Woods M; Liang X; Bernstein L; Pike MC; Hopper JL; Bernstein JL
    Int J Cancer; 2022 Oct; 151(8):1304-1309. PubMed ID: 35315524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by mode of detection and tumor size: a case-control study.
    Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Apicella C; Stone J; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Jun; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 27316945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic non-dense area and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: a causal inference approach in a case-control study.
    Velásquez García HA; Sobolev BG; Gotay CC; Wilson CM; Lohrisch CA; Lai AS; Aronson KJ; Spinelli JJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 29516373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
    Wanders JOP; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N; Holland K; Kallenberg M; Peeters PHM; Nielsen M; Lillholm M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 May; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 29720220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study.
    Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Stone J; McLean C; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):859. PubMed ID: 29246131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjusting for BMI in analyses of volumetric mammographic density and breast cancer risk.
    Hudson S; Vik Hjerkind K; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Trewin C; Ursin G; Dos-Santos-Silva I; De Stavola BL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):156. PubMed ID: 30594212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.