286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29040364)
21. Four-Year Interim Results of the Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.
Hong P; Kim SS; Jeong C; Hwang SH; Kim TS; Park JH; Song YG; Song YK
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(3):895-903. PubMed ID: 33649929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Silicone Implants with Smooth Surfaces Induce Thinner but Denser Fibrotic Capsules Compared to Those with Textured Surfaces in a Rodent Model.
Fischer S; Hirche C; Reichenberger MA; Kiefer J; Diehm Y; Mukundan S; Alhefzi M; Bueno EM; Kneser U; Pomahac B
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132131. PubMed ID: 26151888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Results of the Postmarket Clinical Study of the Sientra 207 Highly Cohesive Gel Breast Implants in Primary and Revision Augmentation.
Schwartz MR; Haws MJ; Phillips G
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Apr; 141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):40S-48S. PubMed ID: 29595717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of Macrotextured Shaped Extra Full Projection Cohesive Gel Implants in Primary Aesthetic Breast Augmentation.
Montemurro P; Cheema M; Hedén P; Ferri M; Quattrini Li A; Avvedimento S
Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Apr; 37(4):408-418. PubMed ID: 27836857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Anatomic Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes and Aesthetic Results Compared to Smooth Round Silicone Implants.
Agochukwu-Nwubah N; Boustany A; Wetzel M; Maus J; Rinker B
Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Jul; 39(8):NP322-NP330. PubMed ID: 30874722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Eight-Year Safety Data for Round and Anatomical Silicone Gel Breast Implants.
Duteille F; Perrot P; Bacheley MH; Stewart S
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Feb; 38(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 29040345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Five-Year Safety and Satisfaction With the Lightweight Breast Implant.
Orel GY; Noam C; Jacky GY
Aesthet Surg J; 2022 Feb; 42(3):261-272. PubMed ID: 33564821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Silicone breast prostheses: A cohort study of complaints, complications, and explantations between 2003 and 2015.
Pool SMW; Wolthuizen R; Mouës-Vink CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Nov; 71(11):1563-1569. PubMed ID: 30172729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Capsular Contracture Rate in Augmentation Mammoplasty With Motiva Breast Implant Insertion: A Single-Center Experience in Korea.
Lee S; Kim M; Kim M; Ryu W; Back S
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Oct; 43(11):1248-1255. PubMed ID: 37254824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study).
Khanna J; Mosher M; Whidden P; Nguyen S; Garzon D; Bhogal M
Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Nov; 39(12):1342-1349. PubMed ID: 30383228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface Silicone Breast Implants: Outcome Analysis of 100 Primary Breast Augmentations over 3 Years and Technical Considerations.
Huemer GM; Wenny R; Aitzetmüller MM; Duscher D
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Jun; 141(6):831e-842e. PubMed ID: 29794696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Polyurethane Implants in Revisional Breast Augmentation: A Prospective 5-Year Study.
Hamdi M; Kapila AK; Peters E; Ramaut L; Waked K; Giunta G; De Baerdemaeker R; Zeltzer A
Aesthet Surg J; 2024 May; 44(6):NP379-NP390. PubMed ID: 38408194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Silicone lymphadenopathy after breast augmentation: case reports, review of the literature, and current thoughts.
Zambacos GJ; Molnar C; Mandrekas AD
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 23354761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants.
Sampaio Góes JC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 19936826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Management of Capsular Contracture in Cases of Silicone Gel Breast Implant Rupture with Use of Pulse Lavage and Open Capsulotomy.
Lam MC; Walgenbach-Brünagel G; Pryalukhin A; Vorhold J; Pech T; Kalff JC; Kristiansen G; Walgenbach KJ
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(5):1173-1185. PubMed ID: 31367775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nine-Year Core Study Data for Sientra's FDA-Approved Round and Shaped Implants with High-Strength Cohesive Silicone Gel.
Stevens WG; Calobrace MB; Harrington J; Alizadeh K; Zeidler KR; d'Incelli RC
Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 26961987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transitioning From Conventional Textured to Nanotextured Breast Implants: Our Early Experience and Modifications for Optimal Breast Augmentation Outcomes.
Montemurro P; Tay VKS
Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Jan; 41(2):189-195. PubMed ID: 32582953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mentor Contour Profile Gel Implants: Clinical Outcomes at 10 Years.
Hammond DC; Canady JW; Love TR; Wixtrom RN; Caplin DA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1142-1150. PubMed ID: 29176413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
