162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29040707)
1. Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study.
Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Kiljunen T; Shi XQ; Wolff J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Apr; 179(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 29040707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the effective dose in supine, prone, and oblique positions in the maxillofacial region using a novel combined extremity and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography scanner.
Koivisto J; Wolff J; Järnstedt J; Dastidar P; Kortesniemi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Sep; 118(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25151590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Kadesjö N; Shi XQ; Wolff J
J Foot Ankle Res; 2015; 8():8. PubMed ID: 25788986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region.
Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Ludlow J; Kiljunen T; Shi XQ; Wolff J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):128-138. PubMed ID: 33811787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional X ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 23825221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hand-wrist, knee, and foot-ankle dosimetry and image quality measurements of a novel extremity imaging unit providing CBCT and 2D imaging options.
Ludlow JB
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4955-4963. PubMed ID: 30229941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Dosimetry of cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scanning for temporal bone].
Xie XY; Zhang ZY; Wang Z; Yin GX; Jia SM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 98(23):1837-1840. PubMed ID: 29925165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging.
De Cock J; Zanca F; Canning J; Pauwels R; Hermans R
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jul; 25(7):1891-900. PubMed ID: 25773935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure.
Hofmann E; Schmid M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Sep; 75(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 25158951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface radiation dose comparison of a dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) machine in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms.
Tschauner S; Marterer R; Nagy E; Apfaltrer G; Riccabona M; Singer G; Stücklschweiger G; Guss H; Sorantin E
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178747. PubMed ID: 28570626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of image quality and radiation dose of cone beam and low-dose multislice computed tomography--an in-vitro investigation.
Hofmann E; Schmid M; Sedlmair M; Banckwitz R; Hirschfelder U; Lell M
Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):301-11. PubMed ID: 23460022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of radiation doses imparted during 128-, 256-, 384-multislice CT-scanners and cone beam computed tomography for intra- and perioperative cochlear implant assessment.
Guberina N; Dietrich U; Arweiler-Harbeck D; Forsting M; Ringelstein A
Am J Otolaryngol; 2017; 38(6):649-653. PubMed ID: 28942233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics.
Signorelli L; Patcas R; Peltomäki T; Schätzle M
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26747662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric analysis of the use of CBCT in diagnostic radiology: sinus and middle ear.
Dierckx D; Saldarriaga Vargas C; Rogge F; Lichtherte S; Struelens L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jan; 163(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 24771211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Carrafiello G; Dizonno M; Colli V; Strocchi S; Pozzi Taubert S; Leonardi A; Giorgianni A; Barresi M; Macchi A; Bracchi E; Conte L; Fugazzola C
Radiol Med; 2010 Jun; 115(4):600-11. PubMed ID: 20177988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the effective dose of cone beam CT and multislice CT for temporomandibular joint examinations at optimized exposure levels.
Kadesjö N; Benchimol D; Falahat B; Näsström K; Shi XQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150041. PubMed ID: 26119344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
