162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29040707)
21. Evaluation of different low-dose multidetector CT and cone beam CT protocols in maxillary sinus imaging: part I-an in vitro study.
Almashraqi AA; Ahmed EA; Mohamed NS; Barngkgei IH; Elsherbini NA; Halboub ES
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20160323. PubMed ID: 28266870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Estimation of effective doses from MDCT and CBCT imaging of extremities.
Ludlow JB; Johnson BK; Ivanovic M
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1371-1383. PubMed ID: 30255853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.
Pauwels R; Beinsberger J; Collaert B; Theodorakou C; Rogers J; Walker A; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 21196094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effective doses from cone beam CT investigation of the jaws.
Davies J; Johnson B; Drage N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jan; 41(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 22184626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation.
Ruivo J; Mermuys K; Bacher K; Kuhweide R; Offeciers E; Casselman JW
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 19174709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of radiation exposure in dental cone-beam computerized tomography with the use of metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Tapiovaara M; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 22862982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cone-beam CT versus multi-slice CT systems for postoperative imaging of cochlear implantation--a phantom study on image quality and radiation exposure using human temporal bones.
Theunisse HJ; Joemai RM; Maal TJ; Geleijns J; Mylanus EA; Verbist BM
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Apr; 36(4):592-9. PubMed ID: 25420084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of subjective image quality, contrast to noise ratio and modulation transfer function in the middle ear using a novel full body cone beam computed tomography device.
Heikkinen AK; Rissanen V; Aarnisalo AA; Nyman K; Sinkkonen ST; Koivisto J
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 37038130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pediatric Phantom Dosimetry of Kodak 9000 Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Yepes JF; Booe MR; Sanders BJ; Jones JE; Ehrlich Y; Ludlow JB; Johnson B
Pediatr Dent; 2017 May; 39(3):229-232. PubMed ID: 28583248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT].
Coppenrath E; Draenert F; Lechel U; Veit R; Meindl T; Reiser M; Mueller-Lisse U
Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 18543414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners.
Pauwels R; Beinsberger J; Stamatakis H; Tsiklakis K; Walker A; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R; Horner K;
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jul; 114(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 22727102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 3D cone-beam CT of the ankle using a novel twin robotic X-ray system: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
Grunz JP; Kunz AS; Gietzen CH; Weng AM; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Ergün S; Schmitt R; Bley TA; Gassenmaier T
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 119():108659. PubMed ID: 31520930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Head and neck effective dose and quantitative assessment of image quality: a study to compare cone beam CT and multislice spiral CT.
Nardi C; Talamonti C; Pallotta S; Saletti P; Calistri L; Cordopatri C; Colagrande S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Oct; 46(7):20170030. PubMed ID: 28511564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Small field of view cone beam CT temporomandibular joint imaging dosimetry.
Lukat TD; Wong JC; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130082. PubMed ID: 24048693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cone-Beam CT Compared to Multi-Slice CT for the Diagnostic Analysis of Conductive Hearing Loss: A Feasibility Study.
Kemp P; Stralen JV; De Graaf P; Berkhout E; Horssen PV; Merkus P
J Int Adv Otol; 2020 Aug; 16(2):222-226. PubMed ID: 32784161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantification of metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images.
Pauwels R; Stamatakis H; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R; Horner K; Tsiklakis K;
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():94-9. PubMed ID: 22168574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Postoperative computed tomography imaging of pediatric patients with craniosynostosis: radiation dose and image quality comparison between multi-slice computed tomography and O-arm cone-beam computed tomography.
Kaasalainen T; Männistö V; Mäkelä T; Suojanen J; Nuorala A; Heliövaara A; Leikola J
Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Jul; 53(8):1704-1712. PubMed ID: 36967418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
