162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29040707)
41. Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
Hirschinger V; Hanke S; Hirschfelder U; Hofmann E
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):152-60, 162-3. PubMed ID: 25744093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Thyroid shields for radiation dose reduction during cone beam computed tomography scanning for different oral and maxillofacial regions.
Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e376-80. PubMed ID: 22209523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An
Patrick S; Birur NP; Gurushanth K; Raghavan AS; Gurudath S
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 28393820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Two examples of indication specific radiation dose calculations in dental CBCT and Multidetector CT scanners.
Stratis A; Zhang G; Lopez-Rendon X; Politis C; Hermans R; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Shaheen E; Bosmans H
Phys Med; 2017 Sep; 41():71-77. PubMed ID: 28392311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Do image modality and registration method influence the accuracy of craniofacial navigation?
Widmann G; Zangerl A; Schullian P; Fasser M; Puelacher W; Bale R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22079059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Dose area product in estimation of effective dose of the patients undergoing dental cone beam computed tomography examinations.
Kralik I; Faj D; Lauc T; Škarica M; Popić J; Brkic H
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1412-1427. PubMed ID: 30264736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of Radiation Exposure Associated With Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Follow-up Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography for Evaluating Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs.
Steuwe A; Geisbüsch P; Schulz CJ; Böckler D; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
J Endovasc Ther; 2016 Aug; 23(4):583-92. PubMed ID: 27193306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Use of gray values in CBCT and MSCT images for determination of density: influence of variation of FOV size.
Rodrigues AF; Campos MJ; Chaoubah A; Fraga MR; Farinazzo Vitral RW
Implant Dent; 2015 Apr; 24(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 25706259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography for small foreign body detection in the hand in comparison with radiography, MSCT and MRI: an ex vivo study.
Jandl NM; Rolvien T; Rupp T; Schumacher U; Püschel K; Maas KJ; Amling M; Henes FO; Spink C
Injury; 2021 Oct; 52(10):2841-2847. PubMed ID: 33487409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
Liang X; Jacobs R; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Corpas L; Souza PC; Martens W; Shahbazian M; Alonso A; Lambrichts I
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL; Howerton WB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16798915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Morphologic examination of the temporal bone by cone beam computed tomography: comparison with multislice helical computed tomography.
Dahmani-Causse M; Marx M; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Lepage B; Escudé B
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2011 Nov; 128(5):230-5. PubMed ID: 22014530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography in diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial fractures in dried human skull: an in vitro study.
Eskandarlou A; Poorolajal J; Talaeipour AR; Talebi S; Talaeipour M
Dent Traumatol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23826823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiation Dose-Equivalent Radiography, Multidetector Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Fractures of Adult Cadaveric Wrists.
Neubauer J; Benndorf M; Reidelbach C; Krauß T; Lampert F; Zajonc H; Kotter E; Langer M; Fiebich M; Goerke SM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164859. PubMed ID: 27788215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
Nackaerts O; Maes F; Yan H; Couto Souza P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of scattered entrance skin dose burden in MSCT, CBCT, and X-ray for suspected scaphoid injury: Regional dose measurements in a phantom model.
Hughes J; Harris M; Snaith B; Benn H
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):811-816. PubMed ID: 35183441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging.
Deman P; Atwal P; Duzenli C; Thakur Y; Ford NL
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(12):3201-22. PubMed ID: 24862349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cone beam CT paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose multidetector CT studies.
Al Abduwani J; ZilinSkiene L; Colley S; Ahmed S
Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 26700263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of manual and dose reduction modes of a MORITA R100 CBCT.
Rottke D; Dreger J; Sawada K; Honda K; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180009. PubMed ID: 30182744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
