163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29040707)
61. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Internal or in-scan validation: a method to assess CBCT and MSCT gray scales using a human cadaver.
Bujtár P; Simonovics J; Zombori G; Fejer Z; Szucs A; Bojtos A; Batista WO; Váradi K; Sándor GK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Jun; 117(6):768-79. PubMed ID: 24842449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms.
Theodorakou C; Walker A; Horner K; Pauwels R; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R;
Br J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 85(1010):153-60. PubMed ID: 22308220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. [Comparison of quality on digital X-ray devices with 3D-capability for ENT-clinical objectives in imaging of temporal bone and paranasal sinuses].
Knörgen M; Brandt S; Kösling S
Rofo; 2012 Dec; 184(12):1153-60. PubMed ID: 23081736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Radiation dose evaluation in tomosynthesis and C-arm cone-beam CT examinations with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Koyama S; Aoyama T; Oda N; Yamauchi-Kawaura C
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4298-306. PubMed ID: 20879590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Dose Reduction in Dental CT: A Phantom Study With Special Focus on Tin Filter Technique.
Hackenbroch C; Schnaidt S; Halt D; Wilde F; Beer M; Wunderlich A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Oct; 215(4):945-953. PubMed ID: 32783561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices.
Rottke D; Patzelt S; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120417. PubMed ID: 23584925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Cone beam computed tomography-based models versus multislice spiral computed tomography-based models for assessing condylar morphology.
Gomes LR; Gomes MR; Gonçalves JR; Ruellas AC; Wolford LM; Paniagua B; Benavides E; Cevidanes LH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Jan; 121(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 26679363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Comparison of the Radiation Dose from Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multidetector Computed Tomography in Examinations of the Hand.
Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Gerstmair A; Krauss T; Reising K; Zajonc H; Kotter E; Langer M; Fiebich M; Voigt J
Rofo; 2016 May; 188(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 26981913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Finger fractures imaging: accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
Faccioli N; Foti G; Barillari M; Atzei A; Mucelli RP
Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1087-95. PubMed ID: 20224906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The Role of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Scan for Detection and Follow-Up of Traumatic Wrist Pathologies.
Pallaver A; Honigmann P
J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Dec; 44(12):1081-1087. PubMed ID: 31610905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Cone beam computed tomography for imaging orbital trauma--image quality and radiation dose compared with conventional multislice computed tomography.
Brisco J; Fuller K; Lee N; Andrew D
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 52(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24139635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography.
Ludlow JB; Walker C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):802-17. PubMed ID: 24286904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. The effective dose of different scanning protocols using the Sirona GALILEOS(®) comfort CBCT scanner.
Chambers D; Bohay R; Kaci L; Barnett R; Battista J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(2):20140287. PubMed ID: 25358865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography.
Suomalainen A; Vehmas T; Kortesniemi M; Robinson S; Peltola J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 18195249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose.
Chinem LA; Vilella Bde S; Maurício CL; Canevaro LV; Deluiz LF; Vilella Ode V
Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(4):66-72. PubMed ID: 27653266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology.
Ludlow JB; Ivanovic M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 18504152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Radiation dose saving through the use of cone-beam CT in hearing-impaired patients.
Faccioli N; Barillari M; Guariglia S; Zivelonghi E; Rizzotti A; Cerini R; Mucelli RP
Radiol Med; 2009 Dec; 114(8):1308-18. PubMed ID: 19789956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Estimation of the radiation dose for pediatric CBCT indications: a prospective study on ProMax3D.
Marcu M; Hedesiu M; Salmon B; Pauwels R; Stratis A; Oenning ACC; Cohen ME; Jacobs R; Baciut M; Roman R; Dinu C; Rotaru H; Barbur I;
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 May; 28(3):300-309. PubMed ID: 29356184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
