164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29040707)
81. Comparison of CBCT radiation doses with conventional radiographs in TMJ imaging using Monte Carlo simulations.
Deniz Y; Eren H; Sessiz R; Coşan Ata G
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2024 Mar; 63(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 38182962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. EFFECTIVE DOSES AND RADIATION RISKS FROM COMMON DENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC, PANORAMIC AND CBCT EXAMINATIONS.
Shatskiy I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Oct; 195(3-4):296-305. PubMed ID: 34086952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Source modeling for Monte Carlo dose calculation of CT examinations with a radiotherapy treatment planning system.
Källman HE; Holmberg R; Andersson J; Kull L; Tranéus E; Ahnesjö A
Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):6118. PubMed ID: 27806588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy.
Liang X; Lambrichts I; Sun Y; Denis K; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 19423257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. [Comparetive study of CBCT and MSCT in the diagnosis of styloid process syndrome].
Zhou C; Jian XC; Min AJ; Sun L; Liu ES; Wu LL
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 30(7):557-560. PubMed ID: 29871069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
86. Intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography in temporal bone imaging for surgical treatment.
Erovic BM; Chan HH; Daly MJ; Pothier DD; Yu E; Coulson C; Lai P; Irish JC
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jan; 150(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 24170658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?
Cascante-Sequeira D; Oliveira-Santos C; Brasil DM; Santaella GM; Swanson C; Blackburn M; Scarfe WC; Haiter-Neto F
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7881-7888. PubMed ID: 37993703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. EFFECTIVE DOSE IN TWO DIFFERENT DENTAL CBCT SYSTEMS: NEWTOM VGi AND PLANMECA 3D MID.
Ghaedizirgar M; Faghihi R; Paydar R; Sina S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Nov; 176(3):287-293. PubMed ID: 28204777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography.
Araki K; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):862-5. PubMed ID: 22092375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Standard and low-dose cone beam computer tomography protocol for orthognatodontic diagnosis: a comparative evaluation.
Portelli M; Militi A; Lo Giudice A; Lo Giudice R; Fastuca R; Ielo I; Mongelli V; Lo Giudice G; Martintoni A; Manuelli M; Lucchese A; Nucera R
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018; 32(2 Suppl. 2):59-66. PubMed ID: 29720332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography.
Schulze D; Heiland M; Thurmann H; Adam G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 15313998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Radiation dose reduction in cone-beam computed tomography of extremities: evaluation of a novel radiation shield.
Matikka H; Virén T
J Radiol Prot; 2014 Jun; 34(2):N57-63. PubMed ID: 24894593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Wong W; Lam N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17980510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. [Comparison of absorbed and effective dose from two dental cone beam computed tomography scanners].
Okano T; Matsuo A; Gotoh K; Yokoi M; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Koyama S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 22449896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. [Evaluation of Absorbed Dose for CBCT in Image-guided Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Each Devices and Facilities].
Kitazato Y; Kuga N; Shirieda K; Enzaki M; Nakaguchi Y; Shimohigashi Y; Kawasaki T; Toyoda M; Kawahara D; Araki F; Kawamura S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(4):309-316. PubMed ID: 28428474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Accuracy assessment of prototypes produced using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography.
Primo BT; Presotto AC; de Oliveira HW; Gassen HT; Miguens SA; Silva AN; Hernandez PA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 41(10):1291-5. PubMed ID: 22578568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Comparing Effective Doses During Image-Guided Core Needle Biopsies with Computed Tomography Versus C-Arm Cone Beam CT Using Adult and Pediatric Phantoms.
Ben-Shlomo A; Cohen D; Bruckheimer E; Bachar GN; Konstantinovsky R; Birk E; Atar E
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2016 May; 39(5):732-739. PubMed ID: 26493824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
