These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative incontinence. Rothschild J; Chang Kit L; Seltz L; Wang L; Kaufman M; Dmochowski R; Milam DF J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 23820053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental investigation of the biomechanics of urethral tissues and structures. Natali AN; Carniel EL; Frigo A; Pavan PG; Todros S; Pachera P; Fontanella CG; Rubini A; Cavicchioli L; Avital Y; De Benedictis GM Exp Physiol; 2016 May; 101(5):641-56. PubMed ID: 26864993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conformation and mechanics of the polymeric cuff of artificial urinary sphincter. Natali AN; Fontanella CG; Todros S; Pavan PG; Carmignato S; Zanini F; Carniel EL Math Biosci Eng; 2020 May; 17(4):3894-3908. PubMed ID: 32987559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. Guralnick ML; Miller E; Toh KL; Webster GD J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed ID: 11956443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental evaluation of an electromechanical artificial urinary sphincter in an animal model. Valerio M; Jichlinski P; Dahlem R; Tozzi P; Mundy AR BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E337-43. PubMed ID: 23305222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival. Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction? Bugeja S; Ivaz SL; Frost A; Andrich DE; Mundy AR BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 26384584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In silico assessment of the reliability and performance of artificial sphincter for urinary incontinence. Mascolini MV; Carniel EL Artif Organs; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38895983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of urethral occlusive techniques for restoration of urinary continence. Burton JH; Mikulich MA; Timm GW; Scott FB; Attia SL; Bradley WE Med Instrum; 1977; 11(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 895596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Mechanical Failures-Is it Better to Replace the Entire Device or Just the Malfunctioning Component? Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1523-1528. PubMed ID: 26493494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of a percutaneously controlled urethral hydraulic occluder for treatment of refractory urinary incontinence in 18 female dogs. Currao RL; Berent AC; Weisse C; Fox P Vet Surg; 2013 May; 42(4):440-7. PubMed ID: 23298302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]