These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29042116)

  • 1. Marginal discrepancy dimensions of single unit metal crowns fabricated by using CAD-CAM-milled acrylate resin polymer blocks or a conventional waxing technique.
    Lalande D; Hodd JA; Brousseau JS; Ramos V; Dunham D; Rueggeberg F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jun; 119(6):948-953. PubMed ID: 29042116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal accuracy and internal fit of machine-milled and cast titanium crowns.
    Han HS; Yang HS; Lim HP; Park YJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 21889006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of the marginal integrity of CAD/CAM interim crowns.
    Kelvin Khng KY; Ettinger RL; Armstrong SR; Lindquist T; Gratton DG; Qian F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):617-23. PubMed ID: 26774313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of margin discrepancy of complete gold crowns fabricated using printed, milled, and conventional hand-waxed patterns.
    Munoz S; Ramos V; Dickinson DP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 27866698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
    de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods.
    Peng CC; Chung KH; Yau HT; Ramos V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):514-522. PubMed ID: 31353116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques.
    Witkowski S; Komine F; Gerds T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16872930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing.
    Farjood E; Vojdani M; Torabi K; Khaledi AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 27460320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the Adaptation of Interim Crowns using Different Measurement Techniques.
    Peng CC; Chung KH; Ramos V
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 31702087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
    Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
    Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Marginal and Internal Adaptation in Provisional Crowns Utilizing Three Distinct Materials.
    Jalalian E; Younesi F; Golalipour S; Khorshidi S; Mahdavisaedabadi SH; Sayyari M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Nov; 24(11):853-858. PubMed ID: 38238272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM.
    Tsitrou EA; Northeast SE; van Noort R
    J Dent; 2007 Jan; 35(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 16781043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.