151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29042468)
1. Comparison of Step-and-Shoot and Continuous-Bed-Motion PET Modes of Acquisition for Limited-View Organ Scans.
Siman W; Kappadath SC
J Nucl Med Technol; 2017 Dec; 45(4):290-296. PubMed ID: 29042468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging.
Meier JG; Erasmus JJ; Gladish GW; Peterson CB; Diab RH; Mawlawi OR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):158-165. PubMed ID: 31816183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and implementation of continuous bed motion (CBM) in Xtrim preclinical PET scanner for whole-body Imaging: MC simulation and experimental measurements.
Bahadorzadeh B; Faghihi R; Sina S; Aghaz A; Rahmim A; Reza Ay M
Phys Med; 2024 Jun; 123():103395. PubMed ID: 38843650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of breathing motion on PET acquisitions: step and shoot versus continuous bed motion.
Owaki Y; Nakahara T; Shimizu T; Smith AM; Luk WK; Inoue K; Fukushi M; Nakajima K
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jul; 39(7):665-671. PubMed ID: 29672464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous bed motion in a silicon photomultiplier-based scanner provides equivalent spatial resolution and image quality in whole body PET images at similar acquisition times using the step-and-shoot method.
Kumamoto K; Sato H; Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Yamashita Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2022 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 35440474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physical performance of adaptive axial FOV PET scanners with a sparse detector block rings or a checkerboard configuration.
Karakatsanis NA; Nehmeh MH; Conti M; Bal G; González AJ; Nehmeh SA
Phys Med Biol; 2022 May; 67(10):. PubMed ID: 35472757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.
MacDonald LR; Harrison RL; Alessio AM; Hunter WC; Lewellen TK; Kinahan PE
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(12):3629-43. PubMed ID: 21610291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance Evaluation of the uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanner Based on NEMA NU 2-2018 with Additional Tests to Characterize PET Scanners with a Long Axial Field of View.
Spencer BA; Berg E; Schmall JP; Omidvari N; Leung EK; Abdelhafez YG; Tang S; Deng Z; Dong Y; Lv Y; Bao J; Liu W; Li H; Jones T; Badawi RD; Cherry SR
J Nucl Med; 2021 Jun; 62(6):861-870. PubMed ID: 33008932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Workflow Considerations for Implementation of Continuous-Bed-Motion PET/CT.
Acuff SN; Osborne D
J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Jun; 44(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 27102661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Axial or Helical? Considerations for wide collimation CT scanners capable of volumetric imaging in both modes.
Lambert JW; Phillips ED; Villanueva-Meyer JE; Nardo L; Facchetti L; Gould RG
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5718-5725. PubMed ID: 28833277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole-body dynamic imaging with continuous bed motion PET/CT.
Osborne DR; Acuff S
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Apr; 37(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 26629770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Texture Feature Comparison Between Step-and-Shoot and Continuous-Bed-Motion
Yamashita S; Okuda K; Nakaichi T; Yamamoto H; Yokoyama K
J Nucl Med Technol; 2021 Mar; 49(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 33020230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image quality assessment along the one metre axial field-of-view of the total-body Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system for
Rausch I; Mannheim JG; Kupferschläger J; la Fougère C; Schmidt FP
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Dec; 9(1):87. PubMed ID: 36513949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Time-of-Flight PET/CT with a Large Axial Field of View for Reducing Whole-Body Acquisition Time.
Akamatsu G; Uba K; Taniguchi T; Mitsumoto K; Narisue A; Tsutsui Y; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Jun; 42(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 24799607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of continuous bed motion and traditional step and shoot PET/CT.
Osborne DR; Acuff S; Cruise S; Syed M; Neveu M; Stuckey A; Bradley Y
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015; 5(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 25625027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison of novel continuous bed motion versus traditional bed position whole-body PET/CT imaging.
Schatka I; Weiberg D; Reichelt S; Owsianski-Hille N; Derlin T; Berding G; Bengel FM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):711-7. PubMed ID: 26546010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phantom-based evaluation of yttrium-90 datasets using biograph vision quadra.
Zeimpekis KG; Mercolli L; Conti M; Sari H; Prenosil G; Shi K; Rominger A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 50(4):1168-1182. PubMed ID: 36504278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuous bed motion on clinical scanner: design, data correction, and reconstruction.
Panin VY; Smith AM; Hu J; Kehren F; Casey ME
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(20):6153-74. PubMed ID: 25255170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study of PET scanner designs using clinical metrics to optimize the scanner axial FOV and crystal thickness.
Surti S; Werner ME; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):3995-4012. PubMed ID: 23685783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]