These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29042580)

  • 1. Distorting temporal fine structure by phase shifting and its effects on speech intelligibility and neural phase locking.
    Xu Y; Chen M; LaFaire P; Tan X; Richter CP
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13387. PubMed ID: 29042580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictions of Speech Chimaera Intelligibility Using Auditory Nerve Mean-Rate and Spike-Timing Neural Cues.
    Wirtzfeld MR; Ibrahim RA; Bruce IC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 18(5):687-710. PubMed ID: 28748487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
    Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues.
    Gilbert G; Bergeras I; Voillery D; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1336. PubMed ID: 17927396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F; Yoho SE; Youngdahl CL; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of short-time acoustic temporal fine structure cues in sentence recognition for normal-hearing listeners.
    Hou L; Xu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):EL127. PubMed ID: 29495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Level considerations for chimeric processing: Temporal envelope and fine structure contributions to speech intelligibility.
    Fogerty D; Entwistle JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):EL459-64. PubMed ID: 26627814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of recovered envelope cues in the identification of temporal-fine-structure speech for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Léger AC; Desloge JG; Braida LD; Swaminathan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):505-8. PubMed ID: 25618081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues.
    Ardoint M; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):89-95. PubMed ID: 19963053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system.
    Shamma S; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2818-33. PubMed ID: 23654388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
    Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers.
    Freyman RL; Griffin AM; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2514-23. PubMed ID: 23039445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dynamic range of useful temporal fine structure cues for speech in the presence of a competing talker.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2162-72. PubMed ID: 21973370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of temporal modulation rate on the intelligibility of phase-based speech.
    Chen F; Guan T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):EL520. PubMed ID: 25669298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.