357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29044114)
1. Evolution of drift robustness in small populations.
LaBar T; Adami C
Nat Commun; 2017 Oct; 8(1):1012. PubMed ID: 29044114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of population size and mutation rate on the evolution of mutational robustness.
Elena SF; Wilke CO; Ofria C; Lenski RE
Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):666-74. PubMed ID: 17348929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mapping the Peaks: Fitness Landscapes of the Fittest and the Flattest.
Franklin J; LaBar T; Adami C
Artif Life; 2019; 25(3):250-262. PubMed ID: 31397601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid evolutionary escape by large populations from local fitness peaks is likely in nature.
Weinreich DM; Chao L
Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1175-82. PubMed ID: 16050095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accumulation of deleterious mutations in small abiotic populations of RNA.
Soll SJ; Díaz Arenas C; Lehman N
Genetics; 2007 Jan; 175(1):267-75. PubMed ID: 17110480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolution favors protein mutational robustness in sufficiently large populations.
Bloom JD; Lu Z; Chen D; Raval A; Venturelli OS; Arnold FH
BMC Biol; 2007 Jul; 5():29. PubMed ID: 17640347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A population genetics model for multiple quantitative traits exhibiting pleiotropy and epistasis.
Taylor CF; Higgs PG
J Theor Biol; 2000 Apr; 203(4):419-37. PubMed ID: 10736218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Note on the computation of critical effective population sizes.
Zhang L; Watson LT
J Comput Biol; 2007 Sep; 14(7):950-60. PubMed ID: 17803372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moderate Amounts of Epistasis are Not Evolutionarily Stable in Small Populations.
Sydykova DK; LaBar T; Adami C; Wilke CO
J Mol Evol; 2020 Jul; 88(5):435-444. PubMed ID: 32350572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different Evolutionary Paths to Complexity for Small and Large Populations of Digital Organisms.
LaBar T; Adami C
PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1005066. PubMed ID: 27923053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The mutation matrix and the evolution of evolvability.
Jones AG; Arnold SJ; Bürger R
Evolution; 2007 Apr; 61(4):727-45. PubMed ID: 17439608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genome size: does bigger mean worse?
Charlesworth B; Barton N
Curr Biol; 2004 Mar; 14(6):R233-5. PubMed ID: 15043833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating.
Glémin S
Evolution; 2003 Dec; 57(12):2678-87. PubMed ID: 14761049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Drift Barriers to Quality Control When Genes Are Expressed at Different Levels.
Xiong K; McEntee JP; Porfirio DJ; Masel J
Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):397-407. PubMed ID: 27838629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biophysical protein folding model accounts for most mutational fitness effects in viruses.
Wylie CS; Shakhnovich EI
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jun; 108(24):9916-21. PubMed ID: 21610162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolution of evolvability in a developmental model.
Draghi J; Wagner GP
Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):301-15. PubMed ID: 18031304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.
Montville R; Froissart R; Remold SK; Tenaillon O; Turner PE
PLoS Biol; 2005 Nov; 3(11):e381. PubMed ID: 16248678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of recombination on the neutral evolution of genetic robustness.
Szöllosi GJ; Derényi I
Math Biosci; 2008; 214(1-2):58-62. PubMed ID: 18490032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of epistasis and its links with genetic robustness, complexity and drift in a phenotypic model of adaptation.
Gros PA; Le Nagard H; Tenaillon O
Genetics; 2009 May; 182(1):277-93. PubMed ID: 19279327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Causal drift, robust signaling, and complex disease.
Wagner A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118413. PubMed ID: 25774510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
