113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2904465)
1. Efficacy of the antiseptic solution 'TCP' against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Acheampong YB; el-Mahmood A; Olurinola PF
J Hosp Infect; 1988 Oct; 12(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 2904465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Inclusion of intestinal antiseptics in rabbit diets.
King JO
Lab Anim; 1981 Apr; 15(2):205-6. PubMed ID: 7278129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Study of combinations of antimicrobial agents. Development of the method].
Martin H; Maris P
Ann Pharm Fr; 1993; 51(4):175-85. PubMed ID: 8154787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BIPP--how does it work?
Nigam A; Allwood MC
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1990 Apr; 15(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 2112432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro comparative study determining bactericidal activity of stabilized chlorine dioxide and other oral rinses.
Drake D; Villhauer AL
J Clin Dent; 2011; 22(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21290979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Synergistic antibiofilm efficacy of various commercial antiseptics, enzymes and EDTA: a study of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.
Lefebvre E; Vighetto C; Di Martino P; Larreta Garde V; Seyer D
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2016 Aug; 48(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 27424598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of antiseptics containing povidone-iodine, octenidine dihydrochloride and ethacridine lactate against biofilm formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus measured with the novel biofilm-oriented antiseptics test.
Junka A; Bartoszewicz M; Smutnicka D; Secewicz A; Szymczyk P
Int Wound J; 2014 Dec; 11(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 23445335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antimicrobial properties of antiseptic-impregnated biological dressings.
Kearney JN; Arain T; Holland KT
J Hosp Infect; 1988 Jan; 11(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 2895140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative efficacies of topical antiseptic eardrops against biofilms from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and quinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Youn CK; Jun Y; Jo ER; Jang SJ; Song H; Cho SI
J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):519-522. PubMed ID: 29909794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative antibacterial activity of topical antiseptic eardrops against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and quinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Youn CK; Jang SJ; Jo ER; Choi JA; Sim JH; Cho SI
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 85():80-3. PubMed ID: 27240501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biologic effects of dental materials. 3. Toxicity and antimicrobial effect of endodontic antiseptics in vitro.
Spangberg L; Engström B; Langeland K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1973 Dec; 36(6):856-71. PubMed ID: 4208832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of copper and zinc ions on the germicidal properties of two popular pharmaceutical antiseptic agents cetylpyridinium chloride and povidone-iodine.
Zeelie JJ; McCarthy TJ
Analyst; 1998 Mar; 123(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 9659710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antiseptic compounds still active against bacterial strains isolated from surgical wound infections despite increasing antibiotic resistance.
Giacometti A; Cirioni O; Greganti G; Fineo A; Ghiselli R; Del Prete MS; Mocchegiani F; Fileni B; Caselli F; Petrelli E; Saba V; Scalise G
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2002 Jul; 21(7):553-6. PubMed ID: 12172750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Determination of antibacterial activity of antiseptic biotextiles in vitro after standard washings].
Lehmann B; Gille Y
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1991 May; 39(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 1909020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. pH influence on antibacterial efficacy of common antiseptic substances.
Wiegand C; Abel M; Ruth P; Elsner P; Hipler UC
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2015; 28(3):147-58. PubMed ID: 25614073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Determining the sensitivity of wound microflora to antiseptics].
Buianov VM; Rodoman GV; Khrupalov AA; Stetsenko EV; Korotaev AL
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 1990 Oct; 145(10):106-7. PubMed ID: 1964259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A test for 'hygienic' hand disinfection.
Ayliffe GA; Babb JR; Quoraishi AH
J Clin Pathol; 1978 Oct; 31(10):923-8. PubMed ID: 101554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of human acute wound fluid on the antibacterial efficacy of different antiseptic polyurethane foam dressings: An in vitro analysis.
Rembe JD; Fromm-Dornieden C; Böhm J; Stuermer EK
Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Jan; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 29363857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Kinetics of in vitro bactericidal activity of the antiseptic biseptine combining 3 active principles].
Reverdy ME; Rougier M; Fleurette J
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1996 Sep; 44(7):675-80. PubMed ID: 8977924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro test of the efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in simulated wound fluid.
Said J; Dodoo CC; Walker M; Parsons D; Stapleton P; Beezer AE; Gaisford S
Int J Pharm; 2014 Feb; 462(1-2):123-8. PubMed ID: 24374221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
