130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29044684)
21. Fertility preservation by photodynamic therapy combined with conization in young patients with early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study.
Choi MC; Jung SG; Park H; Lee SY; Lee C; Hwang YY; Kim SJ
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2014 Sep; 11(3):420-5. PubMed ID: 24927981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Pregnancy and delivery outcomes in women with previous cervical conization].
Milheiras ET; Sarzedas S; Pereira HS; Saraiva J; Retto H
Acta Med Port; 2005; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 16202343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for borderline lesions of the uterine cervix].
Matsuyama T; Tsukamoto N; Kashimura M; Iwasaka T; Saito T; Uchino H; Nakano H; Matsukuma K
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Nov; 36(11):2063-71. PubMed ID: 6512325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cervical conization as definitive therapy for early invasive squamous carcinoma of the cervix.
Morris M; Mitchell MF; Silva EG; Copeland LJ; Gershenson DM
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Nov; 51(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 8276293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic possibilities of the electroexcision and cold knife conization for precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
Zlatkov V; Kostova P; Mihova A; Danon S
J BUON; 2003; 8(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17415864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk for residual adenocarcinoma in situ or cervical adenocarcinoma in women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure/conization for adenocarcinoma in situ.
DeSimone CP; Day ME; Dietrich CS; Tovar MM; Modesitt SC
J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(9-10):376-80. PubMed ID: 22010519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Regeneration Process After Cervical Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Song T; Seong SJ; Kim BG
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1258-1264. PubMed ID: 27824745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Value of loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization and imaging for the diagnosis of papillary squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
Cui C; Chen Z; Luo L; Zeng J; Sun X; Sui L; Xu C; Fu Z; Cong Q
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1166818. PubMed ID: 37476381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A force-measuring device combined with ultrasound-based elastography for assessment of the uterine cervix.
Thomsen CR; Jensen MSS; Leonhard AK; Mortensen TØ; Bor P; Sandager P; Hinge M; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Feb; 101(2):241-247. PubMed ID: 35049047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical Cervical Assessment Using 2-Dimentional Transvaginal Shear Wave Elastography in Nonpregnant and Pregnant Women: A Prospective Pilot Study.
Zhang M; Townsel CD; Akers LB; Kiros L; Treadwell MC; Maturen KE
Ultrasound Q; 2021 Jun; 37(2):183-190. PubMed ID: 34057917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the stiffness of normal cervix and its change with different factors using transvaginal two-dimensional shear wave elastography under strict quality control.
Zhang HP; Wu JJ; Zhang WY; Tao JZ; Ma CB; Zhou YQ
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 May; 23(1):65. PubMed ID: 37217872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative strain elastography of the uterine cervix assessed by the GE Voluson E10 system in combination with a force-measuring device.
Rohr Thomsen C; Leonhard AK; Strandbo Schmidt Jensen M; Bor P; Hinge M; Uldbjerg N; Sandager P
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(1):2213797. PubMed ID: 37202178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of Pre-malignant Lesions of the Uterine Cervix by Shear Wave Elastography: A New Diagnostic Tool.
Sainz JA; Castro L; Romo JM; Holgado A; Fernández-Palacín A; García-Mejido JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Nov; 47(11):3275-3282. PubMed ID: 34376298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adipose tissue: a normal constituent of the uterine cervical stroma.
Doldan A; Otis CN; Pantanowitz L
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2009 Jul; 28(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 19483621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative cervical elastography: a new approach of cervical insufficiency prediction.
Zhang L; Zheng Q; Xie H; Du L; Wu L; Lin M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Jan; 301(1):207-215. PubMed ID: 31758303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of loop excision of the transformation zone on cervical length: implications for pregnancy.
Gentry DJ; Baggish MS; Brady K; Walsh PM; Hungler MS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Mar; 182(3):516-20. PubMed ID: 10739501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can Transvaginal Cervical Elastography predict the success of induction of labor with oxytocin?
Halilzade I; Halilzade Mİ; Sert ÜY; Alkan M; Keskin HL
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2023 Aug; 227(4):277-280. PubMed ID: 37279798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intra- and inter-observer variability of evaluation of uterine cervix elastography images during pregnancy.
Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z; Preis K
Ginekol Pol; 2014 May; 85(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 25011217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 3D ultrasound as a surgical quality control of conization in patients with severe dysplasia: a prospective study.
Dückelmann AM; Wordell J; Richter R; Sehouli J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Nov; 302(5):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 32740870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Advancements in the Application of Ultrasound Elastography in the Cervix.
Shao J; Shi G; Qi Z; Zheng J; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2048-2063. PubMed ID: 34049726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
