These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29045178)

  • 1. Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability.
    Lee CS; Moy L; Friedewald SM; Sickles EA; Monticciolo DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):241-245. PubMed ID: 29045178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The National Mammography Database: Preliminary Data.
    Lee CS; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Burnside ES; Nagy P; Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):883-90. PubMed ID: 26866649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Sprague BL; Arao RF; Miglioretti DL; Henderson LM; Buist DS; Onega T; Rauscher GH; Lee JM; Tosteson AN; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD;
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 28244803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening mammography and the "r" word.
    Truog RD
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(26):2501-3. PubMed ID: 19940292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.
    Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W112-6. PubMed ID: 21257850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On mammography--more agreement than disagreement.
    Partridge AH; Winer EP
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(26):2499-501. PubMed ID: 19940286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening Mammography for Women in Their 40s: The Potential Impact of the American Cancer Society and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations.
    Pitman JA; McGinty GB; Soman RR; Drotman MB; Reichman MB; Arleo EK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 28504572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient preferences in breast cancer screening: lessons to be learned from the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Sadigh G; Kelly AM; Fagerlin A; Carlos RC
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1333-6. PubMed ID: 21835650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for Breast Cancer in Women Age 75 Years and Older.
    Lee CS; Moy L; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Niell BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):256-263. PubMed ID: 29112471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast Cancer Screening: Women's Attitudes and Beliefs in Light of Updated United States Preventive Services Task Force and American Cancer Society Guidelines.
    Mehta JM; MacLaughlin KL; Millstine DM; Faubion SS; Wallace MR; Shah AA; Fields HE; Ruddy BE; Bryan MJ; Patel B; Temkit MH; Buras MR; Golafshar MA; Kling JM
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Mar; 28(3):302-313. PubMed ID: 30204537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you": breast imagers' perspectives regarding screening mammography for others and for themselves--do they practice what they preach?
    Lee J; Gordon PB; Whitman GJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1336-44. PubMed ID: 26001246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alignment of breast cancer screening guidelines, accountability metrics, and practice patterns.
    Onega T; Haas JS; Bitton A; Brackett C; Weiss J; Goodrich M; Harris K; Pyle S; Tosteson AN
    Am J Manag Care; 2017 Jan; 23(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28141929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Simulation Screening Mammography Module Created for Instruction and Assessment: Radiology Residents vs National Benchmarks.
    Poot JD; Chetlen AL
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1454-1462. PubMed ID: 27637285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Woolf SH
    JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):162-3. PubMed ID: 20068210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.
    Smith RA; Cokkinides V; Brooks D; Saslow D; Brawley OW
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2010; 60(2):99-119. PubMed ID: 20228384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: the unbalanced view.
    Evans WP; Lee CH; Monsees BS; Monticciolo DL; Rebner M
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):297; author reply 297-8. PubMed ID: 20851949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physician adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force mammography guidelines.
    Corbelli J; Borrero S; Bonnema R; McNamara M; Kraemer K; Rubio D; Karpov I; McNeil M
    Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(3):e313-9. PubMed ID: 24794545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of the Controversial US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations on the Use of Screening Mammography.
    Sharpe RE; Levin DC; Parker L; Rao VM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):e58-e61. PubMed ID: 27814825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How the USPSTF's Mammographic Screening Guidelines Should Be Interpreted.
    Prasad V
    Am J Med; 2017 Jul; 130(7):769-770. PubMed ID: 28344145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.