These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29045185)

  • 1. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of Prostate Cancer: Comparison of 2D and 3D ROIs.
    Tamada T; Huang C; Ream JM; Taffel M; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):113-117. PubMed ID: 29045185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do the variations in ROI placement technique have influence for prostate ADC measurements?
    Ueno Y; Tamada T; Sofue K; Urase Y; Hinata N; Fujisawa M; Murakami T
    Acta Radiol Open; 2022 Mar; 11(3):20584601221086500. PubMed ID: 35368407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of Index Lesion Size and Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Measured by Prostate Multiparametric MRI: Correlation With Whole-Mount Sectioning of Specimens.
    Diaz de Leon A; Leyendecker JR; Otero-Muinelo S; Grewal H; Xi Y; Francis F; Pedrosa I; Costa DN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):783-788. PubMed ID: 30160988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in ovarian tumor: Effect of region-of-interest methods on ADC values and diagnostic ability.
    Mukuda N; Fujii S; Inoue C; Fukunaga T; Tanabe Y; Itamochi H; Ogawa T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):720-5. PubMed ID: 26201495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method.
    Xu XQ; Hu H; Su GY; Liu H; Shi HB; Wu FY
    Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(5):650-6. PubMed ID: 27587953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Kato S; Kamijima S; Inaoka T; Kamiya N; Sasai D; Terada H; Hiruta N; Suzuki H
    Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 29939084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pilot Study of the Use of Hybrid Multidimensional T2-Weighted Imaging-DWI for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Evaluation of Gleason Score.
    Sadinski M; Karczmar G; Peng Y; Wang S; Jiang Y; Medved M; Yousuf A; Antic T; Oto A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Sep; 207(3):592-8. PubMed ID: 27352026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional vs. reduced field of view diffusion weighted imaging of the prostate: Comparison of image quality, correlation with histology, and inter-reader agreement.
    Warndahl BA; Borisch EA; Kawashima A; Riederer SJ; Froemming AT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47():67-76. PubMed ID: 29103977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of measurement method on interobserver variability of apparent diffusion coefficient of lesions in prostate MRI.
    Takahashi H; Yoshida K; Kawashima A; Lee NJ; Froemming AT; Adamo DA; Khandelwal A; Bolan CW; Heller MT; Hartman RP; Kim B; Philbrick KA; Carter RE; Mynderse LA; Humphreys MR; Cai JC; Takahashi N
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268829. PubMed ID: 35604891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness-Comparison between Conventional and Kurtosis Models.
    Tamada T; Prabhu V; Li J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
    Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 28394755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Same-day repeatability and Between-Sequence reproducibility of Mean ADC in PI-RADS lesions.
    Zhang KS; Neelsen CJO; Wennmann M; Glemser PA; Hielscher T; Weru V; Görtz M; Schütz V; Stenzinger A; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110898. PubMed ID: 37331287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does normalisation improve the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values for prostate cancer assessment? A blinded independent-observer evaluation.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Khalef V; Xu W; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Doshi AM
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Sep; 70(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 26126712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diffusion-weighted quantitative MRI of pleural abnormalities: Intra- and interobserver variability in the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements.
    Priola AM; Priola SM; Gned D; Giraudo MT; Brundu M; Righi L; Veltri A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):769-782. PubMed ID: 28117923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.
    Bickel H; Pinker K; Polanec S; Magometschnigg H; Wengert G; Spick C; Bogner W; Bago-Horvath Z; Helbich TH; Baltzer P
    Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1883-1892. PubMed ID: 27578047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
    Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values.
    Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 24677497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer.
    Gupta RT; Kauffman CR; Garcia-Reyes K; Palmeri ML; Madden JF; Polascik TJ; Rosenkrantz AB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 26204283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantified analysis of histological components and architectural patterns of gleason grades in apparent diffusion coefficient restricted areas upon diffusion weighted MRI for peripheral or transition zone cancer locations.
    Helfrich O; Puech P; Betrouni N; Pinçon C; Ouzzane A; Rizk J; Marcq G; Randazzo M; Durand M; Lakroum S; Leroy X; Villers A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1786-1796. PubMed ID: 28383776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.
    Rozenberg R; Thornhill RE; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Lim C; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 27003049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.