195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29045338)
1. A clinical evaluation of the impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on PET FDG metrics.
Vallot D; Caselles O; Chaltiel L; Fernandez A; Gabiache E; Dierickx L; Zerdoud S; Bauriaud M; Courbon F
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Nov; 38(11):979-984. PubMed ID: 29045338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood PET Reconstruction Compared With Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization on Clinical Image Quality Over a Wide Range of Patient Weights.
Chilcott AK; Bradley KM; McGowan DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 29091008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes of [
Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size.
Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?
Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [
Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [
Ayati N; McIntosh L; Buteau J; Alipour R; Pudis M; Daw N; Jackson P; Hofman MS
Cancer Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38711135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian penalized likelihood PET reconstruction impact on quantitative metrics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Young JR; Mugu VK; Johnson GB; Ehman EC; Packard AT; Homb AC; Nathan MA; Thanarajasingam G; Kemp BJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(6):e32665. PubMed ID: 36820562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.
Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for
Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR
J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment response assessment in [
Dolci C; Spadavecchia C; Crivellaro C; De Ponti E; Todde S; Morzenti S; Turolla EA; Crespi A; Guerra L; Landoni C
Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():177-182. PubMed ID: 30738523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The variation of quantitative parameters and Deauville scores with different reconstruction algorithms in FDG PET/CT imaging of lymphoma patients.
Genc M; Yildirim N; Coskun N; Ozdemir E; Turkolmez S
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2023; 42(6):388-392. PubMed ID: 37524200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm suppresses edge artifacts in PET reconstruction based on point-spread-function.
Yamaguchi S; Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Ishii K; Inoue K; Fukushi M
Phys Med; 2018 Mar; 47():73-79. PubMed ID: 29609821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Application of a High Sensitivity BGO PET/CT Scanner: Effects of Acquisition Protocols and Reconstruction Parameters on Lesions Quantification.
De Ponti E; Crivellaro C; Morzenti S; Monaco L; Todde S; Landoni C; Elisei F; Musarra M; Guerra L
Curr Radiopharm; 2022; 15(3):218-227. PubMed ID: 34994322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduced count pediatric whole-body
Alves VPV; Ata NA; MacLean J; Sharp SE; Li Y; Brady S; Trout AT
Pediatr Radiol; 2024 Jan; 54(1):170-180. PubMed ID: 37962603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of New Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm on Visualization and Quantification of Upper Abdominal Malignant Tumors in Clinical FDG PET/CT Examinations.
Tatsumi M; Soeda F; Kamiya T; Ueda J; Katayama D; Matsunaga K; Watabe T; Kato H; Tomiyama N
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():707023. PubMed ID: 34485143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
