466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29045667)
1. Survey of Reproductive Experiences and Outcomes of Cancer Survivors Who Stored Reproductive Material Before Treatment.
Hammarberg K; Kirkman M; Stern C; McLachlan RI; Clarke G; Agresta F; Gook D; Rombauts L; Vollenhoven B; Fisher JRW
Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2423-2430. PubMed ID: 29045667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons.
Hammarberg K; Kirkman M; Pritchard N; Hickey M; Peate M; McBain J; Agresta F; Bayly C; Fisher J
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):575-581. PubMed ID: 28077428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive choices and outcomes after freezing oocytes for medical reasons: a follow-up study.
Dahhan T; Dancet EA; Miedema DV; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 24951490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experiences and intentions of patients undergoing medically indicated oocyte or embryo cryopreservation: a qualitative study.
Bayefsky MJ; Sampson A; Blakemore JK; Jalili D; Lilly AG; Fino ME; Quinn GP
Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):147-153. PubMed ID: 37944107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond fertility preservation: role of the oncofertility unit in the reproductive and gynecological follow-up of young cancer patients.
Massarotti C; Scaruffi P; Lambertini M; Sozzi F; Remorgida V; Anserini P
Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1462-1469. PubMed ID: 31339999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychosocial experiences of involuntary definitive childless women: a comparative study based on reproductive status.
Ribeiro S; Pedro J; Martins MV
Hum Reprod; 2024 Mar; 39(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 38290160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monitoring fertility (semen analysis) by cancer survivors who banked sperm prior to cancer treatment.
Pacey AA; Merrick H; Arden-Close E; Morris K; Barton LC; Crook AJ; Tomlinson MJ; Wright E; Rowe R; Eiser C
Hum Reprod; 2012 Nov; 27(11):3132-9. PubMed ID: 22926842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study.
Delattre S; Segers I; Van Moer E; Drakopoulos P; Mateizel I; Enghels L; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2524-2536. PubMed ID: 32951035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term follow-up to assess criteria for ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in young women and girls with cancer.
Duffin K; Howie R; Kelsey TW; Wallace HB; Anderson RA
Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 38(6):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 37011633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of women of reproductive age towards fertility and elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility decline in the UK: a cross-sectional survey.
Kasaven LS; Mitra A; Ostrysz P; Theodorou E; Murugesu S; Yazbek J; Bracewell-Milnes T; Ben Nagi J; Jones BP; Saso S
Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2478-2488. PubMed ID: 37816663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.
Volodarsky-Perel A; Cohen Y; Arab S; Son WY; Suarthana E; Dahan MH; Tulandi T; Buckett W
Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 30689898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fertility preservation in adult male patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Q; Lan QY; Zhu WB; Fan LQ; Huang C
Hum Reprod Open; 2024; 2024(1):hoae006. PubMed ID: 38389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ABC of reproductive intentions: a mixed-methods study exploring the spectrum of attitudes towards family building.
Grace B; Shawe J; Johnson S; Usman NO; Stephenson J
Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(5):988-996. PubMed ID: 35238351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fertility preservation and fertility treatment in transgender adolescents and adults in a Swedish region, 2013-2018.
Mattelin E; Strandell A; Bryman I
Hum Reprod Open; 2022; 2022(2):hoac008. PubMed ID: 35309678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Declining realisation of reproductive intentions with age.
Beaujouan É; Reimondos A; Gray E; Evans A; Sobotka T
Hum Reprod; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1906-1914. PubMed ID: 31560763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transgender men's experiences of fertility preservation: a qualitative study.
Armuand G; Dhejne C; Olofsson JI; Rodriguez-Wallberg KA
Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):383-390. PubMed ID: 27999119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient experiences of fertility clinic closure during the COVID-19 pandemic: appraisals, coping and emotions.
Boivin J; Harrison C; Mathur R; Burns G; Pericleous-Smith A; Gameiro S
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2556-2566. PubMed ID: 32761248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.
Alvarez RM; Ramanathan P
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2051-2059. PubMed ID: 27370358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation-ESHRE-ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives.
Martinez F;
Fertil Steril; 2017 Sep; 108(3):407-415.e11. PubMed ID: 28739117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.
Luke B; Brown MB; Missmer SA; Spector LG; Leach RE; Williams M; Koch L; Smith YR; Stern JE; Ball GD; Schymura MJ
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 26577302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
