These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29045866)

  • 21. Designable structures are easy to unfold.
    Dias CL; Grant M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Oct; 74(4 Pt 1):042902. PubMed ID: 17155116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The distribution of structures in evolving protein populations.
    Taverna DM; Goldstein RA
    Biopolymers; 2000 Jan; 53(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10644946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Imprint of evolution on protein structures.
    Tiana G; Shakhnovich BE; Dokholyan NV; Shakhnovich EI
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Mar; 101(9):2846-51. PubMed ID: 14970345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of machine learning algorithms to classify binary protein sequences as highly-designable or poorly-designable.
    Peto M; Kloczkowski A; Honavar V; Jernigan RL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Nov; 9():487. PubMed ID: 19014713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reduced alphabet of prebiotic amino acids optimally encodes the conformational space of diverse extant protein folds.
    Solis AD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):158. PubMed ID: 31362700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing folding codes for proteins and polymers.
    Chan HS; Dill KA
    Proteins; 1996 Mar; 24(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 8778780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Structural determinant of protein designability.
    England JL; Shakhnovich EI
    Phys Rev Lett; 2003 May; 90(21):218101. PubMed ID: 12786593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a family of designed sequences.
    Koehl P; Levitt M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Jan; 99(2):691-6. PubMed ID: 11782533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sequence and structural analysis of two designed proteins with 88% identity adopting different folds.
    Saravanan KM; Balasubramanian H; Nallusamy S; Samuel S
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2010 Dec; 23(12):911-8. PubMed ID: 20952437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Correlations between designability and various structural characteristics of protein lattice models.
    Yang JY; Yu ZG; Anh V
    J Chem Phys; 2007 May; 126(19):195101. PubMed ID: 17523837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new approach to protein fold recognition based on Delaunay tessellation of protein structure.
    Zheng W; Cho SJ; Vaisman II; Tropsha A
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 1997; ():486-97. PubMed ID: 9390317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Capturing protein sequence-structure specificity using computational sequence design.
    Mach P; Koehl P
    Proteins; 2013 Sep; 81(9):1556-70. PubMed ID: 23609941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Kinetics of protein folding. A lattice model study of the requirements for folding to the native state.
    Sali A; Shakhnovich E; Karplus M
    J Mol Biol; 1994 Feb; 235(5):1614-36. PubMed ID: 8107095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predicting Designability of Small Proteins from Graph Features of Contact Maps.
    Leelananda SP; Jernigan RL; Kloczkowski A
    J Comput Biol; 2016 May; 23(5):400-11. PubMed ID: 27159634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exploring the sequence fitness landscape of a bridge between protein folds.
    Tian P; Best RB
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e1008285. PubMed ID: 33048928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Thermodynamic propensities of amino acids in the native state ensemble: implications for fold recognition.
    Wrabl JO; Larson SA; Hilser VJ
    Protein Sci; 2001 May; 10(5):1032-45. PubMed ID: 11316884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Protein structure determination using metagenome sequence data.
    Ovchinnikov S; Park H; Varghese N; Huang PS; Pavlopoulos GA; Kim DE; Kamisetty H; Kyrpides NC; Baker D
    Science; 2017 Jan; 355(6322):294-298. PubMed ID: 28104891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accurate prediction for atomic-level protein design and its application in diversifying the near-optimal sequence space.
    Fromer M; Yanover C
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):682-705. PubMed ID: 19003998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Protein structure and evolutionary history determine sequence space topology.
    Shakhnovich BE; Deeds E; Delisi C; Shakhnovich E
    Genome Res; 2005 Mar; 15(3):385-92. PubMed ID: 15741509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.