191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29046952)
1. Evaluation of a visual acuity test using closed Landolt-Cs to determine malingering.
Kröger N; Jürgens C; Kohlmann T; Tost F
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 255(12):2459-2465. PubMed ID: 29046952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The closed Landolt ring--a handy test for evaluating suspected simulation].
Gräf M; Roesen J
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jun; 218(6):435-7. PubMed ID: 11488010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ocular malingering: a surprising visual acuity test.
Graf MH; Roesen J
Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 120(6):756-60. PubMed ID: 12049580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unilateral ocular malingering - a new test for the assessment of visual acuity.
Tonagel F; Kelbsch C; Kernstock C
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 97(6):e949-e951. PubMed ID: 30761765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].
Becker R; Gräf M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16418930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].
Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Oct; 228(10):864-7. PubMed ID: 21997822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distance doubling visual acuity test: a reliable test for nonorganic visual loss.
Zinkernagel SM; Mojon DS
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 247(6):855-8. PubMed ID: 19089440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pattern visual evoked potentials in malingering.
Nakamura A; Akio T; Matsuda E; Wakami Y
J Neuroophthalmol; 2001 Mar; 21(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 11315983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of visual acuity measurement with Landolt rings versus numbers].
Rohrschneider K; Spittler AR; Bach M
Ophthalmologe; 2019 Nov; 116(11):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 30927070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
Heinrich SP; Bach M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer monitor pixellation and Landolt C visual acuity.
Carkeet A; Lister L; Goh YT
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Nov; 41(6):1176-1182. PubMed ID: 34533231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of the Lithander (Kolt test) pediatric visual acuity test with the standardized Landolt ring test].
Cavazos H; Schulz E; Rassow B; Wesemann W
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):324-8. PubMed ID: 2280568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Amblyopia: reading speed in comparison with visual acuity for gratings, single Landolt Cs and series Landolt Cs].
Bach M; Strahl P; Waltenspiel S; Kommerell G
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):500-3. PubMed ID: 2272583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of early visual impairment in patients with epiretinal membrane.
Nishi Y; Shinoda H; Uchida A; Koto T; Mochimaru H; Nagai N; Tsubota K; Ozawa Y
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e353-7. PubMed ID: 23387556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M; Kunawut C; Masayaanon P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 14516806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optotype and grating visual acuity in patients with ocular and cerebral visual impairment.
Stiers P; Vanderkelen R; Vandenbussche E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 45(12):4333-9. PubMed ID: 15557440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing visual acuity across five disease types: ETDRS charts are faster with clinical outcome comparable to Landolt Cs.
Koenig S; Tonagel F; Schiefer U; Bach M; Heinrich SP
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 252(7):1093-9. PubMed ID: 24867313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Information from false statements concerning visual acuity and visual field in cases of psychogenic visual impairment.
Gräf MH
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1999 Jan; 237(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 9951636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of optical defocus on the legibility of the Tumbling-E and Landolt-C.
Reich LN; Ekabutr M
Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 79(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 12086306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of visual function in suspected ocular malingering.
Fahle M; Mohn G
Br J Ophthalmol; 1989 Aug; 73(8):651-4. PubMed ID: 2765446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
