BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29047015)

  • 1. Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.
    De Groot L; Harris I; Regehr G; Tekian A; Ingledew PA
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Apr; 34(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 29047015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Resources Available on the Internet.
    Yang F; Ingledew PA
    J Cancer Educ; 2022 Dec; 37(6):1598-1605. PubMed ID: 33770375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digesting the Contents: an Analysis of Online Colorectal Cancer Education Websites.
    Wang L; Gusnowski EM; Ingledew PA
    J Cancer Educ; 2022 Apr; 37(2):263-273. PubMed ID: 32902788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of Online Information Regarding Cervical Cancer.
    Dawson JQ; Davies JM; Ingledew PA
    Cureus; 2020 Aug; 12(8):e9511. PubMed ID: 32879831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Depression in cancer: quality assessment of online patient education resources.
    Li ZHJ; Wang M; Ingledew PA
    Psychooncology; 2021 Mar; 30(3):400-407. PubMed ID: 33179340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Past and Present of Breast Cancer Resources: A Re-evaluation of the Quality of Online Resources After Eight Years.
    Killow V; Lin J; Ingledew PA
    Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e28120. PubMed ID: 36134068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hand It to Dr Google: The Quality of Online Information on Ganglion Cysts.
    Ji TA; Wells N; Ingledew PA
    Hand (N Y); 2022 Jan; 17(1):141-147. PubMed ID: 31965864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of Online Information for Esophageal Cancer.
    Parmar GS; Das S; Ingledew PA
    J Cancer Educ; 2023 Jun; 38(3):863-869. PubMed ID: 35854205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Evaluation of the Quality of COVID-19 Internet Resources for Cancer Patients.
    Jin R; Simmons C; Lim HJ; Ingledew PA
    J Cancer Educ; 2023 Jun; 38(3):763-771. PubMed ID: 35726079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fountain of knowledge? The quality of online resources for testicular cancer patients.
    Yeo S; Eigl B; Ingledew PA
    Can Urol Assoc J; 2020 Aug; 14(8):E363-E368. PubMed ID: 32209216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Assessment of Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Educational Resources for Platelet-Rich Plasma.
    Ghodasra JH; Wang D; Jayakar RG; Jensen AR; Yamaguchi KT; Hegde VV; Jones KJ
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Jan; 34(1):272-278. PubMed ID: 28784239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
    Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?
    Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for the Most Common Cancers.
    Li JZH; Kong T; Killow V; Wang L; Kobes K; Tekian A; Ingledew PA
    J Cancer Educ; 2023 Feb; 38(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 34365589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AN ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THYROID CANCER WEBSITES.
    Chang KL; Grubbs EG; Ingledew PA
    Endocr Pract; 2019 Oct; 25(10):1003-1011. PubMed ID: 31170373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
    Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
    Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of online information on breast cancer treatment options.
    Arif N; Ghezzi P
    Breast; 2018 Feb; 37():6-12. PubMed ID: 29040893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.