275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29047385)
1. Fully quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion ready for clinical use: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography.
Engblom H; Xue H; Akil S; Carlsson M; Hindorf C; Oddstig J; Hedeer F; Hansen MS; Aletras AH; Kellman P; Arheden H
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Oct; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 29047385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
Morton G; Chiribiri A; Ishida M; Hussain ST; Schuster A; Indermuehle A; Perera D; Knuuti J; Baker S; Hedström E; Schleyer P; O'Doherty M; Barrington S; Nagel E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 60(16):1546-55. PubMed ID: 22999722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Qualitative assessments of myocardial ischemia by cardiac MRI and coronary stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in relation to quantitative perfusion by positron emission tomography in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.
Akil S; Hedeer F; Carlsson M; Arheden H; Oddstig J; Hindorf C; Jögi J; Erlinge D; Engblom H
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):2351-2359. PubMed ID: 30535919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fully automated, inline quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: repeatability of measurements in healthy subjects.
Brown LAE; Onciul SC; Broadbent DA; Johnson K; Fent GJ; Foley JRJ; Garg P; Chew PG; Knott K; Dall'Armellina E; Swoboda PP; Xue H; Greenwood JP; Moon JC; Kellman P; Plein S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jul; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 29983119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Mapping by CMR to Detect Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Validation Against Invasive Coronary Physiology.
Kotecha T; Martinez-Naharro A; Boldrini M; Knight D; Hawkins P; Kalra S; Patel D; Coghlan G; Moon J; Plein S; Lockie T; Rakhit R; Patel N; Xue H; Kellman P; Fontana M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 12(10):1958-1969. PubMed ID: 30772231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the arterial input sampling location on the diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress myocardial perfusion quantification.
Milidonis X; Franks R; Schneider T; Sánchez-González J; Sammut EC; Plein S; Chiribiri A
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Mar; 23(1):35. PubMed ID: 33775247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
Hsu LY; Jacobs M; Benovoy M; Ta AD; Conn HM; Winkler S; Greve AM; Chen MY; Shanbhag SM; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):697-707. PubMed ID: 29454767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correlates significantly to rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients with severe coronary artery disease: a preliminary study.
Qayyum AA; Hasbak P; Larsson HBW; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Mathiasen AB; Vejlstrup NG; Kjaer A; Kastrup J
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 24815746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sex- and age-specific normal values for automated quantitative pixel-wise myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Brown LAE; Gulsin GS; Onciul SC; Broadbent DA; Yeo JL; Wood AL; Saunderson CED; Das A; Jex N; Chowdhary A; Thirunavukarasu S; Sharrack N; Knott KD; Levelt E; Swoboda PP; Xue H; Greenwood JP; Moon JC; Adlam D; McCann GP; Kellman P; Plein S
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Mar; 24(4):426-434. PubMed ID: 36458882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fully automated pixel-wise quantitative CMR-myocardial perfusion with CMR-coronary angiography to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Zhao SH; Guo WF; Yao ZF; Yang S; Yun H; Chen YY; Han TT; Zhou XY; Fu CX; Zeng MS; Li CG; Pan CZ; Jin H
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7238-7249. PubMed ID: 37145148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduced global myocardial perfusion reserve in DCM and HCM patients assessed by CMR-based velocity-encoded coronary sinus flow measurements and first-pass perfusion imaging.
Bietenbeck M; Florian A; Shomanova Z; Meier C; Yilmaz A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 107(11):1062-1070. PubMed ID: 29774406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Voxel-wise quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: effect of variations in methodology and validation with positron emission tomography.
Miller CA; Naish JH; Ainslie MP; Tonge C; Tout D; Arumugam P; Banerji A; Egdell RM; Clark D; Weale P; Steadman CD; McCann GP; Ray SG; Parker GJ; Schmitt M
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jan; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 24460930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.
Mordini FE; Haddad T; Hsu LY; Kellman P; Lowrey TB; Aletras AH; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 24433707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value of global myocardial perfusion reserve assessment based on coronary sinus flow measurements using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in addition to myocardial stress perfusion imaging.
Shomanova Z; Florian A; Bietenbeck M; Waltenberger J; Sechtem U; Yilmaz A
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 18(8):851-859. PubMed ID: 28369259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Splenic switch-off as a predictor for coronary adenosine response: validation against 13N-ammonia during co-injection myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner.
Patriki D; von Felten E; Bakula A; Giannopoulos AA; Kamani CH; Schwyzer M; Messerli M; Benz DC; Gebhard C; Gräni C; Pazhenkottil AP; Kaufmann PA; Fuchs TA; Buechel RR
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Jan; 23(1):3. PubMed ID: 33407586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of quantitative CMR perfusion imaging by comparison with simultaneous
Kero T; Johansson E; Engström M; Eggers KM; Johansson L; Ahlström H; Lubberink M
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1252-1266. PubMed ID: 31313066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between regional myocardial oxygenation and perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
Karamitsos TD; Leccisotti L; Arnold JR; Recio-Mayoral A; Bhamra-Ariza P; Howells RK; Searle N; Robson MD; Rimoldi OE; Camici PG; Neubauer S; Selvanayagam JB
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 19920032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advances in Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging: Physiological Implications, the Importance of Quantitative Analysis, and Impact on Patient Care in Coronary Artery Disease.
Sakuma H; Ishida M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 21(1):195-211. PubMed ID: 34108304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Function Derived From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Gated 13N-Ammonia Positron Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Head-to-Head Comparison Using Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance.
Sager DF; Manz N; Manser S; Laubscher L; Stark AW; Schütze J; Heiniger PS; Markendorf S; Kaufmann PA; Gräni C; Buechel RR
Acad Radiol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):1248-1255. PubMed ID: 37940426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
