These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

888 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29047455)

  • 1. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
    Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetric feasibility of real-time MRI-guided proton therapy.
    Moteabbed M; Schuemann J; Paganetti H
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111713. PubMed ID: 25370627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images.
    Koivula L; Wee L; Korhonen J
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4634. PubMed ID: 27487880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI-based IMRT planning for MR-linac: comparison between CT- and MRI-based plans for pancreatic and prostate cancers.
    Prior P; Chen X; Botros M; Paulson ES; Lawton C; Erickson B; Li XA
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(10):3819-42. PubMed ID: 27089554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo study on the sensitivity of prompt gamma imaging to proton range variations due to interfractional changes in prostate cancer patients.
    Schmid S; Landry G; Thieke C; Verhaegen F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Parodi K; Dedes G
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(24):9329-47. PubMed ID: 26581022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
    Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new treatment planning approach accounting for prompt gamma range verification and interfractional anatomical changes.
    Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Pinto M; Kamp F; Belka C; Parodi K
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(9):095005. PubMed ID: 32135530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion on the planning target volume for prostate cancer patients.
    Böckelmann F; Putz F; Kallis K; Lettmaier S; Fietkau R; Bert C
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2020 Jul; 196(7):647-656. PubMed ID: 32157345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
    Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beam angle evaluation to improve inter-fraction motion robustness in pelvic lymph node irradiation with proton therapy.
    Gravgaard Andersen A; Casares-Magaz O; Petersen J; Toftegaard J; Bentzen L; Thörnqvist S; Muren LP
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):846-852. PubMed ID: 28464734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmarking of a treatment planning system for spot scanning proton therapy: comparison and analysis of robustness to setup errors of photon IMRT and proton SFUD treatment plans of base of skull meningioma.
    Harding R; Trnková P; Weston SJ; Lilley J; Thompson CM; Short SC; Loughrey C; Cosgrove VP; Lomax AJ; Thwaites DI
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111710. PubMed ID: 25370624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
    Rana S; Zheng Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrated MRI-guided proton therapy planning: Accounting for the full MRI field in a perpendicular system.
    Burigo LN; Oborn BM
    Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1853-1873. PubMed ID: 34908170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of intrafraction and residual interfraction effect on prostate proton pencil beam scanning.
    Tang S; Deville C; Tochner Z; Wang KK; McDonough J; Vapiwala N; Both S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec; 90(5):1186-94. PubMed ID: 25442043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of daily imaging on plan quality and normal tissue toxicity for prostate cancer radiotherapy.
    Bell K; Heitfeld M; Licht N; Rübe C; Dzierma Y
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):7. PubMed ID: 28069053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective study comparing MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) setup strategies for prostate treatment: repositioning vs. replanning.
    Kim JI; Park JM; Choi CH; An HJ; Kim YJ; Kim JH
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):139. PubMed ID: 31387593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the benefit of PBS vs. VMAT dose distributions in terms of dosimetric sparing and robustness against inter-fraction anatomical changes for pediatric abdominal tumors.
    Guerreiro F; Zachiu C; Seravalli E; Ribeiro CO; Janssens GO; Ries M; de Senneville BD; Maduro JH; Brouwer CL; Korevaar EW; Knopf AC; Raaymakers BW
    Radiother Oncol; 2019 Sep; 138():158-165. PubMed ID: 31302390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetric feasibility of intensity modulated proton therapy in a transverse magnetic field of 1.5 T.
    Hartman J; Kontaxis C; Bol GH; Frank SJ; Lagendijk JJ; van Vulpen M; Raaymakers BW
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5955-69. PubMed ID: 26182957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positioning accuracy and daily dose assessment for prostate cancer treatment using in-room CT image guidance at a proton therapy facility.
    Maeda Y; Sato Y; Minami H; Yasukawa Y; Yamamoto K; Tamamura H; Shibata S; Bou S; Sasaki M; Tameshige Y; Kume K; Ooto H; Kasahara S; Shimizu Y; Saga Y; Omoya A; Saitou M
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1832-1843. PubMed ID: 29532489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.