849 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29047455)
1. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric feasibility of real-time MRI-guided proton therapy.
Moteabbed M; Schuemann J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111713. PubMed ID: 25370627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images.
Koivula L; Wee L; Korhonen J
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4634. PubMed ID: 27487880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRI-based IMRT planning for MR-linac: comparison between CT- and MRI-based plans for pancreatic and prostate cancers.
Prior P; Chen X; Botros M; Paulson ES; Lawton C; Erickson B; Li XA
Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(10):3819-42. PubMed ID: 27089554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte Carlo study on the sensitivity of prompt gamma imaging to proton range variations due to interfractional changes in prostate cancer patients.
Schmid S; Landry G; Thieke C; Verhaegen F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Parodi K; Dedes G
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(24):9329-47. PubMed ID: 26581022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new treatment planning approach accounting for prompt gamma range verification and interfractional anatomical changes.
Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Pinto M; Kamp F; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(9):095005. PubMed ID: 32135530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion on the planning target volume for prostate cancer patients.
Böckelmann F; Putz F; Kallis K; Lettmaier S; Fietkau R; Bert C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2020 Jul; 196(7):647-656. PubMed ID: 32157345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beam angle evaluation to improve inter-fraction motion robustness in pelvic lymph node irradiation with proton therapy.
Gravgaard Andersen A; Casares-Magaz O; Petersen J; Toftegaard J; Bentzen L; Thörnqvist S; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):846-852. PubMed ID: 28464734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benchmarking of a treatment planning system for spot scanning proton therapy: comparison and analysis of robustness to setup errors of photon IMRT and proton SFUD treatment plans of base of skull meningioma.
Harding R; Trnková P; Weston SJ; Lilley J; Thompson CM; Short SC; Loughrey C; Cosgrove VP; Lomax AJ; Thwaites DI
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111710. PubMed ID: 25370624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrated MRI-guided proton therapy planning: Accounting for the full MRI field in a perpendicular system.
Burigo LN; Oborn BM
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1853-1873. PubMed ID: 34908170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of intrafraction and residual interfraction effect on prostate proton pencil beam scanning.
Tang S; Deville C; Tochner Z; Wang KK; McDonough J; Vapiwala N; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec; 90(5):1186-94. PubMed ID: 25442043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of daily imaging on plan quality and normal tissue toxicity for prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Bell K; Heitfeld M; Licht N; Rübe C; Dzierma Y
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):7. PubMed ID: 28069053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective study comparing MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) setup strategies for prostate treatment: repositioning vs. replanning.
Kim JI; Park JM; Choi CH; An HJ; Kim YJ; Kim JH
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):139. PubMed ID: 31387593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the benefit of PBS vs. VMAT dose distributions in terms of dosimetric sparing and robustness against inter-fraction anatomical changes for pediatric abdominal tumors.
Guerreiro F; Zachiu C; Seravalli E; Ribeiro CO; Janssens GO; Ries M; de Senneville BD; Maduro JH; Brouwer CL; Korevaar EW; Knopf AC; Raaymakers BW
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Sep; 138():158-165. PubMed ID: 31302390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric feasibility of intensity modulated proton therapy in a transverse magnetic field of 1.5 T.
Hartman J; Kontaxis C; Bol GH; Frank SJ; Lagendijk JJ; van Vulpen M; Raaymakers BW
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5955-69. PubMed ID: 26182957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
