BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29047791)

  • 1. Optimal defocus selection based on normed Fourier transform for digital fringe pattern profilometry.
    Kamagara A; Wang X; Li S
    Appl Opt; 2017 Oct; 56(28):8014-8022. PubMed ID: 29047791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination and adjustment of optimal defocus level for fringe projection systems.
    Han B; Yang S; Chen S
    Appl Opt; 2019 Aug; 58(23):6300-6307. PubMed ID: 31503774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High dynamic defocus response method for binary defocusing fringe projection profilometry.
    Zheng Z; Gao J; Zhuang Y; Zhang L; Chen X
    Opt Lett; 2021 Aug; 46(15):3749-3752. PubMed ID: 34329272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defocusing parameter selection strategies based on PSF measurement for square-binary defocusing fringe projection profilometry.
    Wang Y; Zhao H; Jiang H; Li X
    Opt Express; 2018 Aug; 26(16):20351-20367. PubMed ID: 30119346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimized pulse width modulation pattern strategy for three-dimensional profilometry with projector defocusing.
    Zuo C; Chen Q; Feng S; Feng F; Gu G; Sui X
    Appl Opt; 2012 Jul; 51(19):4477-90. PubMed ID: 22772122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal frequency selection for accuracy improvement in binary defocusing fringe projection profilometry.
    Zhu J; Feng X; Zhu C; Zhou P
    Appl Opt; 2022 Aug; 61(23):6897-6904. PubMed ID: 36255771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Depth-driven variable-frequency sinusoidal fringe pattern for accuracy improvement in fringe projection profilometry.
    Rao G; Song L; Zhang S; Yang X; Chen K; Xu J
    Opt Express; 2018 Aug; 26(16):19986-20008. PubMed ID: 30119317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal pulse width modulation for sinusoidal fringe generation with projector defocusing.
    Wang Y; Zhang S
    Opt Lett; 2010 Dec; 35(24):4121-3. PubMed ID: 21165110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Passive binary defocusing for large depth 3D measurement based on deep learning.
    Li Y; Shen J; Wu Z; Zhang Q
    Appl Opt; 2021 Aug; 60(24):7243-7253. PubMed ID: 34613012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Active projection nonlinear
    Wang L; Zhang Y; Yi L; Hao X; Wang M; Wang X
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2022 Nov; 39(11):1983-1991. PubMed ID: 36520694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional shape profiling by out-of-focus projection of colored pulse width modulation fringe patterns.
    Silva A; Flores JL; Muñoz A; Ayubi GA; Ferrari JA
    Appl Opt; 2017 Jun; 56(18):5198-5203. PubMed ID: 29047570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Online fringe pitch selection for defocusing a binary square pattern projection phase-shifting method.
    Hu Y; Liu Z; Yang D; Quan C
    Opt Express; 2020 Oct; 28(21):30710-30725. PubMed ID: 33115066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motion-induced error reduction for binary defocusing profilometry via additional temporal sampling.
    Wang Y; Suresh V; Li B
    Opt Express; 2019 Aug; 27(17):23948-23958. PubMed ID: 31510291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Profilometry with digital fringe-projection at the spatial and temporal Nyquist frequencies.
    Padilla M; Servin M; Garnica G
    Opt Express; 2017 Sep; 25(19):22292-22302. PubMed ID: 29041542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theoretical analysis and experimental investigation of the Floyd-Steinberg-based fringe binary method with offset compensation for accurate 3D measurement.
    You D; You Z; Zhou P; Zhu J
    Opt Express; 2022 Jul; 30(15):26807-26823. PubMed ID: 36236866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-shot 3D shape measurement of discontinuous objects based on a coaxial fringe projection system.
    Wang Z; Zhang Z; Gao N; Xiao Y; Gao F; Jiang X
    Appl Opt; 2019 Feb; 58(5):A169-A178. PubMed ID: 30873975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-time high dynamic range 3D measurement using fringe projection.
    Zhang L; Chen Q; Zuo C; Feng S
    Opt Express; 2020 Aug; 28(17):24363-24378. PubMed ID: 32906978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recovery of absolute height from wrapped phase maps for fringe projection profilometry.
    Xu Y; Jia S; Bao Q; Chen H; Yang J
    Opt Express; 2014 Jul; 22(14):16819-28. PubMed ID: 25090499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phase error analysis and compensation for phase shifting profilometry with projector defocusing.
    Zheng D; Da F; Kemao Q; Seah HS
    Appl Opt; 2016 Jul; 55(21):5721-8. PubMed ID: 27463929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the squared binary, sinusoidal pulse width modulation, and optimal pulse width modulation methods for three-dimensional shape measurement with projector defocusing.
    Wang Y; Zhang S
    Appl Opt; 2012 Mar; 51(7):861-72. PubMed ID: 22410887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.