These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29048176)

  • 1. Meta-analysis of the effect of natural frequencies on Bayesian reasoning.
    McDowell M; Jacobs P
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Dec; 143(12):1273-1312. PubMed ID: 29048176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning: Problem format manipulations and individual skill differences.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):577-591. PubMed ID: 28383994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Now you Bayes, now you don't: effects of set-problem and frequency-format mental representations on statistical reasoning.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25711182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What facilitates Bayesian reasoning? A crucial test of ecological rationality versus nested sets hypotheses.
    Brase G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):703-709. PubMed ID: 32885405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search.
    Wu CM; Meder B; Filimon F; Nelson JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1274-1297. PubMed ID: 28318286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which cognitive individual differences predict good Bayesian reasoning? Concurrent comparisons of underlying abilities.
    Brase G
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Feb; 49(2):235-248. PubMed ID: 32815106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not.
    Hoffrage U; Gigerenzer G; Krauss S; Martignon L
    Cognition; 2002 Jul; 84(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 12044739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measures of Bayesian Reasoning Performance on 'Normal' and 'Natural' Frequency Tasks.
    Stock R; Fisk JE; Montgomery C
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(3):185-214. PubMed ID: 27410053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning.
    Sirota M; Navarrete G; Juanchich M
    Cognition; 2024 Apr; 245():105722. PubMed ID: 38309041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():340. PubMed ID: 25873904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Hagmayer Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 23794254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Children's quantitative Bayesian inferences from natural frequencies and number of chances.
    Pighin S; Girotto V; Tentori K
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():164-175. PubMed ID: 28692831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian perspective on constructing a written assessment of probabilistic clinical reasoning in experienced clinicians.
    Kreiter CD
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):44-48. PubMed ID: 26486941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness.
    Weber P; Binder K; Krauss S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1833. PubMed ID: 30369891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structural mapping in statistical word problems: A relational reasoning approach to Bayesian inference.
    Johnson ED; Tubau E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):964-971. PubMed ID: 27678378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to train your Bayesian: a problem-representation transfer rather than a format-representation shift explains training effects.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 25283723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Another chance for good reasoning.
    Pighin S; Tentori K; Girotto V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1995-2002. PubMed ID: 28265865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When and for whom do frequencies facilitate performance? On the role of numerical literacy.
    Hill WT; Brase GL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2343-68. PubMed ID: 22630143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Boosting for insight and/or boosting for agency? How to maximize accurate test interpretation with natural frequencies.
    Feufel MA; Keller N; Kendel F; Spies CD
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Feb; 23(1):75. PubMed ID: 36747214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.