These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29048486)

  • 21. Global epistasis on fitness landscapes.
    Diaz-Colunga J; Skwara A; Gowda K; Diaz-Uriarte R; Tikhonov M; Bajic D; Sanchez A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 May; 378(1877):20220053. PubMed ID: 37004717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inferring fitness landscapes by regression produces biased estimates of epistasis.
    Otwinowski J; Plotkin JB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jun; 111(22):E2301-9. PubMed ID: 24843135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Valley-of-Death: reciprocal sign epistasis constrains adaptive trajectories in a constant, nutrient limiting environment.
    Chiotti KE; Kvitek DJ; Schmidt KH; Koniges G; Schwartz K; Donckels EA; Rosenzweig F; Sherlock G
    Genomics; 2014 Dec; 104(6 Pt A):431-7. PubMed ID: 25449178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recombination and mutational robustness in neutral fitness landscapes.
    Klug A; Park SC; Krug J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 15(8):e1006884. PubMed ID: 31415555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories.
    Weinreich DM; Watson RA; Chao L
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1165-74. PubMed ID: 16050094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cluster partitions and fitness landscapes of the Drosophila fly microbiome.
    Eble H; Joswig M; Lamberti L; Ludington WB
    J Math Biol; 2019 Aug; 79(3):861-899. PubMed ID: 31101975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selecting among three basic fitness landscape models: Additive, multiplicative and stickbreaking.
    Miller CR; Van Leuven JT; Wichman HA; Joyce P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Jul; 122():97-109. PubMed ID: 29198859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How Good Are Statistical Models at Approximating Complex Fitness Landscapes?
    du Plessis L; Leventhal GE; Bonhoeffer S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Sep; 33(9):2454-68. PubMed ID: 27189564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of Host Species on Topography of the Fitness Landscape for a Plant RNA Virus.
    Cervera H; Lalić J; Elena SF
    J Virol; 2016 Nov; 90(22):10160-10169. PubMed ID: 27581976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relation Between the Number of Peaks and the Number of Reciprocal Sign Epistatic Interactions.
    Saona R; Kondrashov FA; Khudiakova KA
    Bull Math Biol; 2022 Jun; 84(8):74. PubMed ID: 35713756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evolution at 'Sutures' and 'Centers': Recombination Can Aid Adaptation of Spatially Structured Populations on Rugged Fitness Landscapes.
    Cooper JD; Kerr B
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1005247. PubMed ID: 27973606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adaptation in protein fitness landscapes is facilitated by indirect paths.
    Wu NC; Dai L; Olson CA; Lloyd-Smith JO; Sun R
    Elife; 2016 Jul; 5():. PubMed ID: 27391790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detecting epistasis from an ensemble of adapting populations.
    McCandlish DM; Otwinowski J; Plotkin JB
    Evolution; 2015 Sep; 69(9):2359-70. PubMed ID: 26194030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of high-order epistasis in the within-host fitness of a positive-sense plant RNA virus.
    Lalić J; Elena SF
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Dec; 28(12):2236-47. PubMed ID: 26344415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantifying the similarity of monotonic trajectories in rough and smooth fitness landscapes.
    Lobkovsky AE; Wolf YI; Koonin EV
    Mol Biosyst; 2013 Jul; 9(7):1627-31. PubMed ID: 23460358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inferring the paths of somatic evolution in cancer.
    Misra N; Szczurek E; Vingron M
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(17):2456-63. PubMed ID: 24812340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identifying restrictions in the order of accumulation of mutations during tumor progression: effects of passengers, evolutionary models, and sampling.
    Diaz-Uriarte R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16():41. PubMed ID: 25879190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evolution Rapidly Optimizes Stability and Aggregation in Lattice Proteins Despite Pervasive Landscape Valleys and Mazes.
    Bertram J; Masel J
    Genetics; 2020 Apr; 214(4):1047-1057. PubMed ID: 32107278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Negative Epistasis in Experimental RNA Fitness Landscapes.
    Bendixsen DP; Østman B; Hayden EJ
    J Mol Evol; 2017 Dec; 85(5-6):159-168. PubMed ID: 29127445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. EvAM-Tools: tools for evolutionary accumulation and cancer progression models.
    Diaz-Uriarte R; Herrera-Nieto P
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Dec; 38(24):5457-5459. PubMed ID: 36287062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.