These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 290495)

  • 21. The "income approach" to dental practice valuation.
    Stockton HJ
    J Dent Pract Adm; 1988; 5(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 3166034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What are the biggest problems facing dental labs today?
    Schwartz B
    Dent Lab Rev; 1985; 60(7):16-9, 33. PubMed ID: 3864663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Practice net income: a tool for practice management and value.
    Mirabito PJ
    J Colo Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 76(2):27-9. PubMed ID: 9470594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Practice survey shows many areas of overhead costs up.
    Anderson PE
    Dent Econ; 1986 Dec; 76(12):27-9. PubMed ID: 3466828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The big, BIG question: how much is my laboratory worth?
    Stein P
    Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1985; 2(1):71-3, 75-7. PubMed ID: 3856304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does your dental laboratory add value?
    Levin RP
    Dent Econ; 1994 Oct; 84(10):76. PubMed ID: 8612882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fixed costs and net income: ways to boost your profits.
    Randle PA
    Dent Manage; 1984 Oct; 24(10):16-8, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 6594254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Collections, overhead contribute to decreased income for groups.
    Anderson PE
    Dent Econ; 1985 Nov; 75(11):88-90, 92, 94 passim. PubMed ID: 3867567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The 1983 survey of general practice in Michigan. Part IV: Dental practice income and expenses.
    Chasteen JE; Lang WP; Faja BW
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1987 Jan; 69(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 3468256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lab Manager 2000. Software package for small labs.
    Bahas M
    J Dent Technol; 2001 Jun; 18(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 11933717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The joy of (understanding) money.
    Rochestie HM
    J Dent Technol; 2001; 18(5):11-3. PubMed ID: 11933705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How to cut overhead costs.
    Gerber PC
    Dent Manage; 1982 May; 22(5):18-21. PubMed ID: 6957333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimating profits in a capitation program. Planning for cost.
    Bentley JM; Barnett PR
    Dent Clin North Am; 1987 Apr; 31(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 3471582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The in-house laboratory decision.
    Bartels HW
    Dent Econ; 1992 Mar; 82(3):55-7. PubMed ID: 1499802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Costs down, prices up, profile marginal: small surprises characterize 1984.
    Overmyer M
    Dent Lab Rev; 1985 Feb; 60(2):6-7, 9-14. PubMed ID: 3864661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can small labs compete with big price-cutters?
    Gitman R
    Dent Lab Rev; 1985; 60(7):26. PubMed ID: 3864665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identifying overhead expenses.
    Levin RP
    Dent Econ; 1997 Jul; 87(7):62. PubMed ID: 9452612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do developments in the dental laboratory industry reflect changes in dental practice and the supply industry?
    Waldman HB
    Ann Dent; 1988; 47(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 3064709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can you justify an in-house lab?
    Dent Econ; 1978 Nov; 68(11):45. PubMed ID: 290494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The triad of practice management.
    Patterson CW; Edwards AC
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1984; 66(11):434-7. PubMed ID: 6596433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.