These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29049603)

  • 1. Enhancing Auditory Selective Attention Using a Visually Guided Hearing Aid.
    Kidd G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 60(10):3027-3038. PubMed ID: 29049603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the Performance of a Visually Guided Hearing Aid Using a Dynamic Auditory-Visual Word Congruence Task.
    Roverud E; Best V; Mason CR; Streeter T; Kidd G
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):756-769. PubMed ID: 29252977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Listeners Fit With Cochlear Implants.
    Dorman MF; Gifford RH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 60(10):3019-3026. PubMed ID: 29049602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Energetic and Informational Components of Speech-on-Speech Masking in Binaural Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort.
    Rennies J; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519854597. PubMed ID: 31172880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2985-95. PubMed ID: 12509020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biologically oriented algorithm for spatial sound segregation.
    Chou KF; Boyd AD; Best V; Colburn HS; Sen K
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1004071. PubMed ID: 36312015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.
    Shinn-Cunningham BG; Best V
    Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):283-99. PubMed ID: 18974202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Synchronization to Competing Speech during Selective Attention.
    Fuglsang SA; Märcher-Rørsted J; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(12):2562-2572. PubMed ID: 32094201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem.
    Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G
    Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):300-15. PubMed ID: 19010794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peripheral hearing loss reduces the ability of children to direct selective attention during multi-talker listening.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():160-172. PubMed ID: 28505526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial Release From Informational Masking: Evidence From Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.
    Zhang M; Mary Ying YL; Ihlefeld A
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518817464. PubMed ID: 30558491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Listening through hearing aids affects spatial perception and speech intelligibility in normal-hearing listeners.
    Cubick J; Buchholz JM; Best V; Lavandier M; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2896. PubMed ID: 30522291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on visually guided attention in a multitalker environment.
    Best V; Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Mar; 10(1):142-9. PubMed ID: 19009321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensorineural hearing loss degrades behavioral and physiological measures of human spatial selective auditory attention.
    Dai L; Best V; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(14):E3286-E3295. PubMed ID: 29555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Benefit of a Visually Guided Beamformer in a Dynamic Speech Task.
    Best V; Roverud E; Streeter T; Mason CR; Kidd G
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722304. PubMed ID: 28758567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.