These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29049770)

  • 1. Accuracy of Heart Rate Monitoring by Some Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers.
    Cadmus-Bertram L; Gangnon R; Wirkus EJ; Thraen-Borowski KM; Gorzelitz-Liebhauser J
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Oct; 167(8):607-608. PubMed ID: 29049770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of Heart Rate Monitoring by Some Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers.
    Singh J; Sittig DF
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Oct; 167(8):607. PubMed ID: 29049769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Accuracy of Heart Rate Monitoring by Some Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers.
    Cadmus-Bertram L; Gangnon R; Wirkus EJ; Thraen-Borowski KM; Gorzelitz-Liebhauser J
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Apr; 166(8):610-612. PubMed ID: 28395305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Investigation of Heartrate Sensing Accuracy by Wrist-Worn Fitness Tracking Devices.
    Turki AF; Jani MB; Ding K; Zhang R; Behbehani K
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():3337-3340. PubMed ID: 31946596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparability and feasibility of wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers in free-living adolescents.
    Scott JJ; Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Morgan PJ; Plotnikoff RC; Lubans DR
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28501418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of wearable physical activity trackers in people with Parkinson's disease.
    Lamont RM; Daniel HL; Payne CL; Brauer SG
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():104-108. PubMed ID: 29729611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and Systematic Biases of Heart Rate Measurements by Consumer-Grade Fitness Trackers in Postoperative Patients: Prospective Clinical Trial.
    Helmer P; Hottenrott S; Rodemers P; Leppich R; Helwich M; Pryss R; Kranke P; Meybohm P; Winkler BE; Sammeth M
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Dec; 24(12):e42359. PubMed ID: 36583938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
    Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical activity using wrist-worn accelerometers: comparison of dominant and non-dominant wrist.
    Dieu O; Mikulovic J; Fardy PS; Bui-Xuan G; Béghin L; Vanhelst J
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Sep; 37(5):525-529. PubMed ID: 26749436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal Alignment of Dual Monitor Accelerometry Recordings.
    Brønd JC; Pedersen NH; Larsen KT; Grøntved A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(14):. PubMed ID: 34300515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Activity Recognition Framework Deploying the Random Forest Classifier and A Single Optical Heart Rate Monitoring and Triaxial AccelerometerWrist-Band.
    Mehrang S; Pietilä J; Korhonen I
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Feb; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 29470385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of Commercial Activity Trackers in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.
    Voss C; Gardner RF; Dean PH; Harris KC
    Can J Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 33(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 28347581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Our pulse - Best in-build fitness monitor.
    Faizan-Ul-Haq ; Yaqoob U; Ali Khan MM
    Indian Heart J; 2018; 70(4):584. PubMed ID: 30170659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of raw acceleration sedentary thresholds in children and adults.
    Hildebrand M; Hansen BH; van Hees VT; Ekelund U
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1814-1823. PubMed ID: 27878845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages and Limitations of Wearable Activity Trackers: Considerations for Patients and Clinicians.
    Walker RK; Hickey AM; Freedson PS
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2016 Dec; 20(6):606-610. PubMed ID: 27857250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of accelerometer wear location on the relationship between step counts and arterial stiffness in adults treated for hypertension and diabetes.
    Cooke AB; Daskalopoulou SS; Dasgupta K
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Apr; 21(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 28855085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating utility and compliance in a patient-based eHealth study using continuous-time heart rate and activity trackers.
    Speier W; Dzubur E; Zide M; Shufelt C; Joung S; Van Eyk JE; Bairey Merz CN; Lopez M; Spiegel B; Arnold C
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Oct; 25(10):1386-1391. PubMed ID: 29850807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis of arrhythmias in athletes wearing heart rate monitors.
    Hunt D; Tanto P
    J R Army Med Corps; 2017 Jun; 163(3):224. PubMed ID: 27811196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of heart rate-based monitors: Apple Watch vs Fitbit Charge HR.
    Bai Y; Hibbing P; Mantis C; Welk GJ
    J Sports Sci; 2018 Aug; 36(15):1734-1741. PubMed ID: 29210326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification of physical activity intensities using a wrist-worn accelerometer in 8-12-year-old children.
    Chandler JL; Brazendale K; Beets MW; Mealing BA
    Pediatr Obes; 2016 Apr; 11(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 25893950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.