BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29049962)

  • 1. Evaluation of methods for managing censored results when calculating the geometric mean.
    Mikkonen HG; Clarke BO; Dasika R; Wallis CJ; Reichman SM
    Chemosphere; 2018 Jan; 191():412-416. PubMed ID: 29049962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of statistical treatments of left-censored environmental data using coincident uncensored data sets: I. Summary statistics.
    Antweiler RC; Taylor HE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(10):3732-8. PubMed ID: 18546715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
    Ganser GH; Hewett P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of the impact of left-censored soil contamination data on the uncertainty of descriptive statistical parameters.
    Shoari N; Dubé JS
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2623-2631. PubMed ID: 26946089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods for Handling Left-Censored Data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
    Canales RA; Wilson AM; Pearce-Walker JI; Verhougstraete MP; Reynolds KA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30120116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distribution-based maximum likelihood estimation methods are preferred for estimating Salmonella concentration in chicken when contamination data are highly left-censored.
    Sun T; Liu Y; Gao S; Qin X; Lin Z; Dou X; Wang X; Zhang H; Dong Q
    Food Microbiol; 2023 Aug; 113():104283. PubMed ID: 37098436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of methods for analyzing left-censored occupational exposure data.
    Huynh T; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Monteiro J; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Nov; 58(9):1126-42. PubMed ID: 25261453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating correlation with multiply censored data arising from the adjustment of singly censored data.
    Newton E; Rudel R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 17265951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of techniques for assessing central tendency in left-censored data using PCB and p,p'DDE contaminant concentrations from Michigan's Bald Eagle Biosentinel Program.
    Leith KF; Bowerman WW; Wierda MR; Best DA; Grubb TG; Sikarske JG
    Chemosphere; 2010 Jun; 80(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 20416924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical Techniques to Analyze Pesticide Data Program Food Residue Observations.
    Szarka AZ; Hayworth CG; Ramanarayanan TS; Joseph RSI
    J Agric Food Chem; 2018 Jul; 66(27):7165-7171. PubMed ID: 29902006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bivariate Left-Censored Measurements in Biomonitoring: A Bayesian Model for the Determination of Biological Limit Values Based on Occupational Exposure Limits.
    Martin Remy A; Wild P
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Jun; 61(5):515-527. PubMed ID: 28475797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating mean exposures from censored data: exposure to benzene in the Australian petroleum industry.
    Glass DC; Gray CN
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jun; 45(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 11378148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
    Zhao Y; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Method of median semi-variance for the analysis of left-censored data: comparison with other techniques using environmental data.
    Zoffoli HJ; Varella CA; do Amaral-Sobrinho NM; Zonta E; Tolón-Becerra A
    Chemosphere; 2013 Nov; 93(9):1701-9. PubMed ID: 23830887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imputation of data values that are less than a detection limit.
    Succop PA; Clark S; Chen M; Galke W
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jul; 1(7):436-41. PubMed ID: 15238313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of censored exposure data by constrained maximization of the Shapiro-Wilk W statistic.
    Flynn MR
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 19955326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of the β-Substitution Method and a Bayesian Method for Analyzing Left-Censored Data.
    Huynh T; Quick H; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jan; 60(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 26209598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward improved analysis of concentration data: Embracing nondetects.
    Shoari N; Dubé JS
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Mar; 37(3):643-656. PubMed ID: 29168890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Empirical and parametric likelihood interval estimation for populations with many zero values: application for assessing environmental chemical concentrations and reproductive health.
    Kang L; Vexler A; Tian L; Cooney M; Louis GM
    Epidemiology; 2010 Jul; 21 Suppl 4():S58-63. PubMed ID: 21422967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.